A COUNCILLOR who first proposed abortion clinic buffer zones in Scotland has been left “frustrated and perplexed” by the lack of action from the SNP Government to legislate.
SNP ministers have been urged to support national legislation for buffer zones outside abortion clinics after passing the buck onto councils to use bylaws to curb protesters despite questions raised over whether local authorities have the powers to do so.
But Cosla has previously warned that legal advice it has received is "unequivocal and confirms that local authorities cannot use byelaws to implement buffer zones at NHS reproductive health facilities".
Nicola Sturgeon has told protesters to instead focus on politicians at Holyrood instead of women accessing medical services for their demonstrations and said her Government was “actively considering how this parliament can legislate in a way that is effective and also capable of withstanding legal challenge”.
Last week, the First Minister also stressed the Scottish Government “will support any local authority that is willing to use by-laws to establish buffer zones”.
In an interview with LBC, SNP Public Health Minister Maree Todd said that “councils can do this using bylaw legislation”.
She added: “If individual councils were to legislate using bylaws, it would be a quicker solution to the problem that we face.”
Ms Todd pointed to calls asking ministers to “legislate nationally”, which she claimed was “trickier”.
She added: “To legislate nationally, we would have to be absolutely 100 per cent sure that it was necessary and proportionate under the European Convention of Human Rights.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to chair abortion clinic buffer zones summit after 'deeply wrong' protests
Claire Miller, Green councillor for Edinburgh city centre, first proposed a buffer zone after protests outside the Chalmers Centre in the capital in 2018, but was told by council officers it would be a matter for police amid concerns it would need to be proportionate.
Ms Miller has now called on ministers to support legislation due to brought forward in a private members’ bill by her Greens colleague, Gillian Mackay, instead of calling on councils to bring forward local action.
She said: "The advice I've received from experts is that we need legislation.
“This same advice has been shared with the government so I am frustrated and perplexed by their lack of action.
“I am calling for the Government to urgently enable us to create buffer zones around health clinics so that everyone can access healthcare without the risk of encountering threatening and intimidating protestors."
Initial legal advice from Edinburgh City Council suggests that “local authorities do have the authorisation” to make an application to serve an antisocial behaviour order “to a particular individual, rather than a group of people who may be causing alarm or distress”.
It added that “the issue of dispersal or restriction of a public protest is a matter primarily for the police” but that councils “have a role to play in working with the police to raise concerns and provide information”
The advice said: “A senior police officer would have to deem the exercise of powers to disperse or restrict public assembly to be proportionate in the circumstances."
“In dealing with a particular individual who may be causing alarm and distress, local authorities do have the authorisation to make an application to serve an ASBO.”
Glasgow City Council has stressed that “access to legal abortion is a human right”, but has warned that “councils have very limited powers to intervene”.
A spokesperson added: "The best way to progress is to work with our partners across local and central government to try and resolve this issue.”
Cosla declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel