Nearly one in 25 people in a county in the Uighur heartland of China has been sentenced to prison on terrorism-related charges in what is the highest known imprisonment rate in the world, analysis of leaked data shows.
A list obtained and partially verified by the Associated Press cites the names of more than 10,000 Uighurs sent to prison in just Konasheher county alone, one of dozens in southern Xinjiang.
In recent years, China has waged a brutal crackdown on the Uighurs, a largely Muslim minority, which it has described as a war on terror.
The list is by far the biggest to emerge to date with the names of imprisoned Uighurs, reflecting the sheer size of a Chinese government campaign that swept an estimated million or more people into internment camps and prisons.
It also confirms what families and rights groups have said for years: China is relying on a system of long-term incarceration to keep the Uighurs in check, wielding the law as a weapon of repression.
Under searing international criticism, Chinese officials announced the closure in 2019 of short-term, extrajudicial internment camps where Uighurs were thrown in without charges.
However, although attention focused on the camps, thousands of Uighurs still languish for years or even decades in prison on what experts say are trumped-up charges of terrorism.
Uighur farmer Rozikari Tohti was known as a soft-spoken, family-loving man with three children and not the slightest interest in religion.
So his cousin, Mihrigul Musa, was shocked to discover Mr Tohti had been thrown into prison for five years for "religious extremism".
"Never did I think he would be arrested," said Mr Musa, who now lives in exile in Norway.
"If you saw him, you would feel the same way. He is so earnest."
From the list, Mr Musa found out Mr Tohti's younger brother Ablikim Tohti also was sentenced to seven years on charges of "gathering the public to disturb social order".
Mr Tohti's next-door neighbour, a farmer called Nurmemet Dawut, was sentenced to 11 years on the same charges as well as "picking quarrels and provoking troubles".
Konasheher county is typical of rural southern Xinjiang, and more than 267,000 people live there.
The prison sentences across the county were for two to 25 years, with an average of nine years, the list shows.
While the people on the list were mostly arrested in 2017, according to Uighurs in exile, their sentences are so long that the vast majority would still be in prison.
Those swept up came from all walks of life, and included men, women, young people and the elderly.
They had only one thing in common: they were all Uighurs.
Experts say it clearly shows people were targeted simply for being Uighur - a conclusion vehemently denied by Chinese authorities.
Xinjiang spokesman Elijan Anayat said sentences were carried out in accordance with the law.
"We will never specifically target specific regions, ethnic groups, religions, much less the Uighurs," Mr Anayat said.
"We will never wrong the good, nor release the bad."
The list was obtained by Xinjiang scholar Gene Bunin from an anonymous source who described themselves as a member of China's Han Chinese majority "opposed to the Chinese government's policies in Xinjiang".
It was passed to the AP by Abduweli Ayup, an exiled Uighur linguist in Norway.
The AP authenticated it through interviews with eight Uighurs who recognised 194 people on the list, as well as legal notices, recordings of phone calls with Chinese officials and checks of address, birthdays and identity numbers.
The list does not include people with typical criminal charges such as homicide or theft.
Rather, it focuses on offences related to terrorism, religious extremism or vague charges traditionally used against political dissidents, such as "picking quarrels and provoking troubles".
This means the true number of people imprisoned is almost certainly higher.
But even at a conservative estimate, Konasheher county's imprisonment rate is more than 10 times higher than that of the United States, one of the world's leading jailers, according to Department of Justice statistics.
It is also more than 30 times higher than for China as a whole, according to state statistics from 2013, the last time such figures were released.
Darren Byler, an expert on Xinjiang's mass incarceration system, said most arrests were arbitrary and outside the law, with people detained for having relatives abroad or downloading certain mobile phone applications.
"It is really remarkable," Mr Byler said.
"In no other location have we seen entire populations of people be described as terrorists or seen as terrorists."
The crackdown kicked into high gear in 2017 after a string of knifings and bombings by a small handful of Uighur militants.
The Chinese government defended the mass detentions as both lawful and necessary to combat terrorism.
In 2019, Xinjiang officials declared the short-term detention camps closed, and said that all of whom they described as "trainees" had "graduated".
Visits by Associated Press journalists to four former camp sites confirm that they were shut or converted into other facilities.
But the prisons remain.
Xinjiang went on a prison-building spree in tandem with the crackdown, and even as the camps closed, the prisons expanded.
At least a few camp sites were converted into centres for incarceration.
China is using the law "as a fig leaf of legality" in part to try and deflect international criticism about holding Uighurs, said Jeremy Daum, a criminal law expert at Yale University's Paul Tsai China Center.
The secretive nature of the charges against those imprisoned is a red flag, experts say.
Although China makes legal records easily accessible otherwise, almost 90% of criminal records in Xinjiang are not public.
The handful which have leaked show that people are being charged with "terrorism" for acts such as warning colleagues against watching porn and swearing, or praying in prison.
Abduweli Ayup, the Uighur exile who passed the list to the AP, has closely documented the ongoing repression of his community.
But this list in particular floored him; on it were neighbours, a cousin and a secondary school teacher.
"I had collapsed," Mr Ayup said. "I had told other people's stories ... and now this is me telling my own story from my childhood."
The widely-admired teacher, Adil Tursun, was the only one in the secondary school in Toquzaq who could teach Uighur students in Chinese.
He was a Communist Party member, and every year his pupils had the best chemistry test scores in the town.
The names of Mr Tursun and others on the list made no sense to Mr Ayup because they were considered model Uighurs.
"The names of the crimes, spreading extremist thoughts, separatism ... these charges are absurd," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel