Former MP Natalie McGarry has been found guilty of embezzling almost £25,000.
McGarry, who represented Glasgow East between 2015 and 2017, was convicted of two charges of embezzlement – totaling £24,635 – after a trial at Glasgow Sheriff Court.
A jury found her guilty by majority of a charge of embezzling money while she was the treasurer of the Women for Independence (WFI) campaign group between April 26 2013 and November 30 2015.
She was also found guilty by majority of a second charge of taking money between April 9 2014 and August 10 2015 when she was treasurer, secretary and convener of the Glasgow Regional Association (GRA) of the SNP.
McGarry now faces jail after an earlier conviction for the crime was quashed by appeal judges in 2019.
The 41-year-old former MP for Glasgow East embezzled the cash despite receiving thousands in sums from family, friends and colleagues.
Ms McGarry arrives at court
Jurors heard how McGarry needed a loan from Health Secretary Humza Yousaf to pay her rent in 2014.
McGarry’s bank account showed WFI money coming in and almost immediately going out - spent on rent, takeaways, grocery shopping as well as a holiday to Spain.
McGarry often complained about being "skint" and despite her then £67,000-a-year Westminster salary in 2015.
She also received £15-20,000 over three years from dad Brian as well as thousands from aunt - former presiding officer - Tricia Marwick.
McGarry was eventually caught in 2015 after a financial probe into an independence group where she was treasurer.
She was convicted by a jury at Glasgow Sheriff Court of the two charges of embezzlement after three hours of deliberations.
McGarry - of Clarkston, East Renfrewshire - had "categorically" denied the two charges.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf 'loaned former MP money'
The court heard McGarry helped found WFI in 2012 with former Health Secretary Jeane Freeman and ex-MSP Carolyn Leckie.
McGarry became treasurer of the organisation whose PayPal funds entered her personal bank account.
WFI raised more than £27,700 from three online crowd funders between April and November 2014.
Humza Yousaf
A "distressed" McGarry was loaned money meantime from Health Secretary Humza Yousaf who heard that she was going to be evicted that day.
Mr Yousaf said in evidence: "There was a reason her and her partner didn’t have access to the funds.
"I offered to give her a loan of funds about the £600 mark from the bank across the road.
"I made the transaction and the money was returned roughly in the timescale."
McGarry remained in control of WFI finances as more money from further fundraisers and a donate button continued to fill her bank account.
The jury was shown a bank statement in which McGarry's personal account had a balance of £10.74 - later topped up by a PayPal transfer of £1,700.
A £1,000 rent payment was then seen to come off the account the following day.
WFI also footed the bill for part of McGarry's five-year Amigo Loan of £5,000 as well as her Tesco and Asda trips and purchases on Just Eat.
READ MORE: Former MP 'sent herself Yes group cash before paying rent'
McGarry who had "no regular income" also went on holiday with partner Mr Meikle to Spain with another couple during this time period.
McGarry transferred £1,140 from her bank account on September 1, 2014 to Mr Meikle who had purchased flights and car hire two days before for £1,035.92.
Prosecutor Alistair Mitchell said to the jury in his closing speech: "The extravagance doesn't matter, she took it dishonestly, it doesn't matter if it was £20 or £20,000.
"Evidence was showing money was being used from WFI for purchases of that sort."
McGarry continued her WFI treasurer role even when she became an MP in spring 2015.
Her constituency office manager Rachel Mackie recalled: “She made a fortune, she was on a good salary and her partner was a councillor, she would be in the office complaining about being skint all the time.”
McGarry was meantime treasurer and convenor of the GRA where she was in sole control of the finances.
McGarry was seen to make cheques out to herself - one notably for £2,000 to pay for media training for election candidates which the company did not receive.
She also kept refunds from parliamentary expenses body IPSA including £600 for a constituency office survey and a £500 election deposit.
McGarry and her father Brian leave court
McGarry meantime paid the survey firm and Shettleston SNP from the GRA purse.
McGarry had been handed pre-signed blank cheques to make such payments as well as others out to cash.
A WFI colleague stated to the jury that McGarry's financial report at a 2015 AGM was "gobbledygook" and "not up to scratch."
An overall total of £66,029 was put into her account from WFI sources.
A WFI financial probe in late 2015 discovered an income and expenditure gap of £31,824 and the matter was reported to the police.
McGarry has only paid back £6,436.21 on September 2015 which was funded by a £6,500 loan from a friend.
McGarry's house was raided by officers in May 2016 where a warrant was read through a door to McGarry who "took refuge" in her bathroom.
She "categorically" denied wrongdoing during her six-days of evidence. McGarry stated that she was "overwhelmed" with doing the "donkey work" for WFI.
She added that the money she had spent was for reimbursements for earlier payments she had personally made for WFI and the GRA.
McGarry sobbed in the witness box when she said: "It’s been the most hellish experience I can possibly imagine. Having my whole life ripped apart when I hadn’t done anything wrong.”
Her defence counsel Allan MacLeod put it to several witnesses that McGarry was "spinning a lot of plates" at the time.
Mr Mitchell made a motion of confiscation for proceeds of crime.
Sentence was deferred pending background reports until next month by sheriff Tom Hughes. McGarry had her bail continued.
Jeanne Freeman
Sherrif Hughes said: "As a result of all the available information to them and your involvement in working with these organisations, you were successfully nominated for potential election on two separate occasions.
"You were successfully a member of parliament and as all this was going on the jury established you were involved in embezzling funds from these organisations - this was a very serious breach of trust which the organisations placed on you."
He added: "The jury heard during crowd funding there were a lot of people contributing to that while they were not able to afford it...it must have been known to you and despite that you were happy to misuse funds accumulated by this organisation for your own use.
"Jeane Freeman, Carolyn Leckie and Elizabeth Young were concerned by the lack of information coming to them and it came to a stage they were likely to become embroiled in this which would have had an effect on the professional bodies they belong to.
"It's quite clear that is what is accepted by the jury - you placed these people in a difficult situation because of the conduct you engaged in embezzling these funds.
"You must now come back to court - these are very serious matters indeed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel