Given politics is already a cruel business, it makes little sense to goad it into doing its worst.
Yet Douglas Ross seemed determined to make a perilous situation more dangerous still.
Before partygate, even before Boris Johnson became PM, the Scottish Tory leader should have known this council election was going to be an uphill struggle.
His party was a hostage to its own success. In 2017, the party, then under Ruth Davidson, had exceeded its wildest expectations.
Fuelled by Nicola Sturgeon’s rash promise a few weeks earlier to hold another referendum on the back of Brexit, the Tories were able to focus the anti-SNP backlash.
Ms Davidson’s troops surged from 115 councillors to 276, while Labour slumped from 394 to 262.
The Tories moved into second place, but by just 14 councillors.
It was the party’s best result in 35 years. It was always highly unlikely that such a high level of support would be repeated.
But Mr Ross spoke and acted as if the maths was on his side.
As late as Monday, he told the Herald: “I’m really confident that we will maintain second place and we will have a really good result.”
That would have been foolhardy at the best of times. But after six months of Westminster sleaze, partygate and the cost of living crisis, it was little short of fantasy.
Today he said voters had sent a message “they are not happy with the prime minister, they are not happy with partygate”, as if it was nothing to do with him.
But Mr Ross was no passive observer. He launched himself headlong into the row over Mr Johnson’s future by demanding he quit then demanding he stay.
As the former Tory MSP Adam Tomkins tweeted: “Douglas Ross owns this, not Boris. It was Douglas who u-turned, Douglas who flipped, and Douglas who backed the PM. He and his team need to own the consequences.”
There was palpable anger among Tory activists at counts yesterday. They knew what was coming, but their leader did nothing to avert it, only made himself look ridiculous.
His judgment, like that of the PM, is now under the microscope.
One Tory source said the party hierarchy had been in denial for weeks. Another that it “needs to be having a closer examination of its strategy or even develop one”.
As to what it all means for the constitution and Indyref2, that’s harder to say.
The SNP got stronger, although not by much, as did the Greens, more healthily. But the third pro-independence party, Alba, was categorically rejected by voters.
The two main unionist parties traded second and third place, while overall the number of Unionist councillors fell by around 20.
Perhaps the key development is that the Tories have lost their grip on the Union card. The party is no longer the main refuge for those worried by the SNP. Voters have shown they will back Labour and the Liberal Democrats instead.
As Mr Ross rues his choices this weekend, Anas Sarwar and Alex Cole-Hamilton will be looking at how to build on their progress to make a Labour-LibDem coalition a serious prospect on the far side of the 2026 Holyrood election.
Read more: Brian Taylor analysis: Labour up, Tories down but Nicola Sturgeon’s SNP remain firmly in first place
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel