THE first time I ever voted I made a holiday out of it. This was in June 1983. I was a student at Stirling University at the time, but term had finished, and I was back in Northern Ireland working.
That didn’t stop me, though. I took a week off and travelled back to Scotland just so I could vote in the general election at Airthrey Castle.
For all the good it did. Michael Forsyth – or Lord Forsyth of Drumlean as he is called these days – was still duly elected by the people of Stirling without my vote.
And so began a long history of voting for the losing side (including the independence and Brexit referendums). Even in 1997. Some lingering suspicion about Tony Blair meant I didn’t vote Labour for once. I still enjoyed staying up for Portillo, right enough.
In the years since I have voted for all the major political parties bar one (anyone who reads this column on even a semi-regular basis can probably guess which). Plus, the Greens (who maybe qualify in Scotland as major now).
And at some point today I will troop along to the local education centre to register my preferred choice(s) for Falkirk North.
Local elections inevitably attract a lower turnout than general elections. Just 46 per cent in Scotland in 2017, though that was actually a big improvement on 2012 when less than 40% of the electorate bothered. Over the last 50 years less than 50% turnout has been typical in Scottish local elections (with the exception of 1999 when it reached almost 60%).
We clearly don’t think local government matters as much on the whole, although the emptying of your bins or the siting of a new housing estate may have just as much impact on your life as anything in Rishi Sunak’s next budget.
Then again, maybe it’s because we have a close-up view of how local government works and are suitably cynical as a result.
But while it’s easy to have some sympathy with Billy Connolly’s famous saying, “Don’t vote, it only encourages them,” I’m not sure it gets us very far. It’s perfectly legitimate to believe that no one deserves your vote. The problem is that unless the rest of the electorate agrees with you no politician will care.
Voting at whatever level has an impact. In the turbulent politics of the last decade that’s probably clearer than ever. And it can have a long tail. The reason Roe v Wade is now under threat from the US Supreme Court is down to less than 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan in the 2016 Presidential election, according to Vanity Fair. Or 0.057% of the vote.
And if nothing else, maybe like sport, we can console ourselves with the notion that it’s not the winning but the taking part that counts.
The first time my daughter was old enough to vote was in 2014 and the Scottish independence referendum. As she cast her vote the polling staff all burst into a round of applause. Never mind the result, that’s easily my favourite voting memory. May any first-time voters get the same joyful treatment today (whatever the result).
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here