IN 2017, Scottish Labour’s council campaign launch was overtaken by events.
Activists were heading to Edinburgh’s Our Dynamic Earth to hear from Kezia Dugdale when Theresa May walked out of Downing Street and shocked the country by calling for an early General Election.
The Scottish Labour leader was forced to rewrite her speech, her local election event effectively becoming Scotland’s first General Election event.
One of the consequences of the unexpected national campaign was that it put a stink on the idea of coalitions.
So when Labour’s new councillors in Aberdeen negotiated a power-sharing deal with the Conservatives, just days after the elections in May and as the campaign for the Westminster election in June heated up, the party took the unprecedented decision to suspend them all.
It was only late last year that the executive committee got round to doing something about it, saying that the councillors could stand again in this year’s elections. But for most of the last five years, the nine suspended elected representatives styled themselves as Aberdeen Labour. Labour without being in Labour.
In 2017, it was the SNP who were the biggest party, winning 19 councillors. However, they fell short of the numbers to form a majority administration. Discussions with the four LibDems came to nothing.
The Tories were the big winners in terms of gains, surging from three councillors to
11. Labour’s nine councillors was a poor result given they had 18 going into the election.
Yet despite being the smaller party, the Tories agreed to let Labour have not just the provost, but also the Leader of the council. It was what then-Tory group leader (now Tory MSP) Douglas Lumsden described as “a Unionist coalition that will put the interests of Aberdeen first, not obsess over a second independence referendum.”
Given that Anas Sarwar has explicitly ruled out coalitions with any party, is that unionist coalition at an end, or could history repeat itself?
But Aberdeen Labour is still some distance away from colleagues in the central belt. There was dismay in the northeast when Mr Sarwar put a windfall tax on oil and gas at the heart of his local government manifesto.
The other big issue for voters in the northeast is the gigantic muddy hole in the city centre. It used to be Union Terrace Gardens, a Victorian oasis just off Union Street. The fate of the gardens has plagued Aberdonians for well over a decade. Plans to upgrade the park were first backed by the LibDem-SNP administration in 2007.
The following year, businessman Sir Ian Wood said he would contribute up to £50 million towards a rival scheme to raise the gardens and develop a new street-level square.
Those plans were eventually rejected in 2012 by the newly-elected Labour administration. In 2016, the Aberdeen Labour-Tory coalition agreed to a £28m redevelopment and had planned on a “soft” reopening to the public last week. Anyone walking past can see there’s still – what the BBC described – as a “considerable amount of work” to be done.
The question is: which party will voters want to finish the job?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel