AN SNP minister has been accused of manufacturing a “phoney row” after claiming Scotland is losing millions of pounds in funding as a result of Brexit.
Employment Minister Richard Lochhead has accused the UK Government of reneging on its promise to replace lost EU funding in full.
The UK Government’s Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), which was introduced to replace previous EU funding, leaves Scotland at least £151 million worse off in the first year of the scheme, Mr Lochhead said.
But the UK Government has insisted that the funds are not being depleted but are being administered through different schemes.
Arrangements announced by Westminster will see Scotland allocated £32 million for 2022/23.
However Scottish ministers have hit out at the funding from the UKSPF, claiming it is £151 million short of the £183 million they estimate to be an appropriate replacement for the EU Structural Funds.
Scotland would then receive a further £55 million in 2023/24 and £125 million in 2024/25, it is understood.
The Scottish Government has said a sum of £162 million would be required each year to replace the funding from the European Development Fund and the European Social Fund, increasing to £183 million each year when LEADER funding and the EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes are included.
Mr Lochhead said: “The UK Government promised that Scotland would not lose out as a result of Brexit, as lost EU funding would be replaced in full through its UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF).
“In order to fulfil this promise, the Scottish Government estimates that £183 million per year would be needed to replace the various streams of EU funding.
“In its first three years, the UK Government has allocated only £212 million through the UKSPF, which is only 39% of the required £549 million replacement amount.”
Mr Lochhead also said the Scottish Government is given no say in how the funds would be spent in Scotland.
He added: “For more than two years we have called on the UK Government to ensure Scottish Government ministers could shape and align this new fund, sharing across a broad spectrum of groups, as was done with European funding.
“Instead, the UK Government is the sole decision-maker for how this funding is used.
“While local authorities will receive Scottish Government support in delivering investment plans, it is deeply concerning the allocation of funding does not include community groups and the third sector which are crucial in tackling poverty and inequality during this cost-of-living crisis.”
But Scottish Secretary Alister Jack has insisted that “contrary to Scottish Government claims, the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) will match EU structural funding”.
He added: “The UKSPF will also get rid of the EU bureaucracy which has previously hampered getting funds into communities. By delivering UKSPF directly into local areas, the UK Government will help deliver local priorities. The money will go where it’s most needed, helping business and creating jobs.
“The UKSPF is in addition to the UK Government’s £171 million investment in Scotland through levelling up funds, and our £1.5 billion in Scotland’s growth deals.”
A UK Government source said: "The SNP are trying to turn this into a phoney row about numbers.
“They simply cannot bring themselves to welcome a scheme that improves on previous EU funding arrangements directed from Brussels, and which will bring huge benefits right across Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel