SCOTTISH Tory leader Douglas Ross has denied he’s been “rendered pathetic” over his u-turn on the future of Boris Johnson.
The MSP was doorstepped by press in Holyrood on Thursday after he steered clear of Westminster, avoiding a crunch vote on referring the Prime Minister to the Commons Privileges Committee.
He told journalists that he still trusted Mr Johnson, but he refused to say if he would back him to lead the Tories into the next general election.
Earlier in the week, Mr Ross was criticised in the Commons by Sir Keir Starmer for abandoning his demand that Mr Johnson quit.
The Labour leader told MPs that the Prime Minister’s attempts to save his job had resulted in “good ministers forced to walk away from public service, the chancellor’s career up in flames and the leader of the Scottish Conservatives rendered pathetic”.
Asked if that was true, Mr Ross said: “Opposition politicians call me lots of things. I will continue to do my job, standing up against the SNP government here in Holyrood, highlighting their approach to many issues. We got no answers from the First Minister.”
Asked directly, if he was pathetic, he replied: “No I'm not. It's very clear that opposition politicians will call each other names a lot of time, I'm going to focus on doing what I'm elected to do here at Holyrood which is holding the SNP government to account and try and get answers from the First Minister.”
Earlier today. Mr Johnson, who is currently on a trade mission to India, told journalists that he intended to lead the Tories into the next general election.
Mr Ross declined to say if he would support the Prime Minister remaining in post at that point.
He said: ”I'm looking at the immediate response right now. I'm focusing on the Scottish Conservative campaign to elect as many Scottish Conservative councillors right across Scotland. I'm looking at what we're doing here in Holyrood, holding the Scottish government to account but also right across Scotland showing that alternative vision for Scotland.”
Mr Ross said he was “very happy” that the Privileges Committee would investigate whether or not the Prime Minister had misled Parliament.
He said: “I think it's right that all the information is in the public domain. And that's what the Privileges Committee will look at. And the chair has recused himself, they will be able to look at all the evidence and I think that's the right thing and the government have made that very clear by withdrawing their amendment and suggesting that that can go through now.”
He added: “I think it's very welcome that the government are keen to get everything out in the public domain, answer questions that the public rightly still have.
Mr Ross denied he was hiding from the vote, saying he hadn’t actually been in Westminster on a Thursday for two years.
"It's physically impossible to get from the Holyrood chamber finishing FMQs at 12:45 to get down to London for a vote at 5pm."
Asked if he trusted the Prime Minister, he said: “Yes, because he is leading the response both from the UK but, in many cases the Western response to what's going in Ukraine.
“But that doesn't absolve him from blame or responsibility for mistakes that were made over partygate.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel