BORIS Johnson is set to address MPs today in a bid to shore up his leadership ahead of a potential slew of new fines for breaking lockdown rules.
Last week, while parliament was in recess, the Prime Minister accepted and paid a Fixed Penalty Notice from the Metropolitan Police for attending a birthday party thrown for him in No 10 in June 2020, at the height of the first lockdown.
Reports over the weekend suggested the Tory leader and his supporters were stunned by the charge, given that it had been a surprise party and that he’d attended for nine minutes.
Given the low bar for the charge, there’s now an expectation more fines could soon be on their way to No 10.
Mr Johnson is understood to have been present at six of at least 12 gatherings being investigated by the Met. They include the "bring your own booze" party in the Downing Street garden on 20 May 2020.
Yesterday, in another Partygate development, Downing Street was forced to deny that Mr Johnson had effectively “instigated” one of the gatherings being probed by the force.
The Times said a leaving do in November 2020 for Lee Cain, No 10’s former director of communications, was at first, the "usual Friday evening wash-up drinks".
But Mr Johnson "came fumbling over, red box in tow", and "gathered the staff around the press office table, which did have bottles of alcohol on it", they continued.
"He said he wanted to say a few words for Lee and started pouring drinks for people and drinking himself. He toasted him."
Mr Johnson then apparently returned to his flat above 11 Downing Street, where a second gathering involving his wife and her friends, celebrating the resignation of Dominic Cummings, is claimed to have taken place that same evening.
Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner said that "if the latest reports are true", it means "not only did the prime minister attend parties, but he had a hand in instigating at least one of them".
No 10 said Mr Johnson had not organised the event and was not involved “until he arrived”.
In his statement to the Commons, as well as touching on the fixed penalty notices, the Prime Minister will attempt to show that it is business as usual.
He will update MPs on the government’s new energy strategy, the cost of living crisis, the plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda, and the war in Ukraine.
He will likely emphasise the closeness of his working relationship with President Volodymyr Zelensky, and the threat posed by Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
However, the session will almost certainly be dominated by questions of trust and whether or not the Prime Minister misled MPs.
Initially, Mr Johnson said no rules had been broken, but he, his wife, Carrie and Chancellor Rishi Sunak, are among 50 people who have now been fined by police for breaking the rules.
The ministerial code is clear that ministers are expected to resign if they knowingly mislead parliament.
Mr Johnson has since said it "did not occur" to him that the birthday party was against Covid lockdown rules.
His allies argue that this was a short meeting during the working day, with people who were working closely around each other anyway.
The Times’ Tory source said the Prime Minister had accepted that “mistakes were made,” but added: “If you’re going from meeting to meeting and it’s something at 2pm in the afternoon, people wouldn’t particularly call that a party. You don’t tend to call that a party.
“If you go to something where you’re giving a speech, you’re not partying, so from his point of view, it’s his place of work, going to events in a work capacity, that’s the context in which these events happened. "
The opposition parties are expected to push for a vote to refer the Prime Minister to the privileges committee which can investigate whether he misled MPs.
Mr Johnson is also set to address the 1922 committee, where he’ll try and reassure his backbenchers ahead of the local elections.
The scale of the problem for the party was laid bare yesterday, in a poll, conducted by J L Partners, which asked almost 2,000 people to give their view of the prime minister in a few words.
The most common word used was “liar”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel