Britain must expel the Russian ambassador to the UK in response to alleged “war crimes” committed in Ukraine by Vladimir Putin and his forces, Labour has demanded.
Italy was expelling 30 Russian diplomats on Tuesday, after Germany kicked out 40 and France 35 in a wave of action amid growing outrage at alleged atrocities.
But Foreign Secretary Liz Truss was understood not to be preparing to expel diplomats and intelligence officers from London.
It was argued that the 23 Russian diplomats kicked out over the Novichok poisonings in Salisbury in 2018 has left few intelligence officers to take action against.
Shadow foreign secretary David Lammy doubled down on Labour’s demands to expel Russian ambassador Andrei Kelin as evidence piled up of possible offences committed by Moscow’s forces.
“The sickening actions committed by Vladimir Putin and his cronies in Ukraine undoubtedly amount to war crimes,” the Labour MP said.
“There should be no place for Russia’s ambassador to parrot the regime’s lies or intelligence agents to continue their hostile activity in the UK.
“Alongside expelling Russia from the United Nations Human Rights Council, we should set up a special tribunal to personally prosecute Putin and his gangster regime.”
Ms Truss has twice hauled Mr Kelin in to the Foreign Office for a dressing down in response to the Kremlin’s renewed invasion of Ukraine in February.
But ministers have so far declined to expel the ambassador, with him being one way to convey British demands to Moscow.
On Monday, a Western official said: “A number of European partners have expelled Russian diplomats, principally intelligence officers.
“Because of all the action we took after Salisbury we actually don’t have very many of that category of Russian in the embassy in London at the moment. So, while we keep it under review, we have no plans at the moment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel