THE Government’s plans to use a third country to process people seeking asylum in the UK are nearing completion, it is understood.
Boris Johnson is said to have been ready to announce the measure to ‘offshore’ applicants to Rwanda last week, due to concerns about the number of people crossing the Channel.
However, The Times reported that concerns were raised about the measures not being ready, and resistance among some Conservative MPs and in the Lords.
It is also understood that a deal to process asylum seekers in Rwanda is still being finalised.
The UK Government hopes to pass the Nationality and Borders bill before the Queen’s speech next month, which includes the controversial plans.
A government source told the Times that the Prime Minister had “wobbled” on making a formal announcement last week, adding: “He wanted to go ahead with it but it’s just not ready.
“It’s close but there are still a lot of things in the balance.”
Opposition politicians, campaigners and charities have all expressed concern about the processing plans after they first emerged last year.
Home Secretary Priti Patel was said to have been considering offshore locations such as decommissioned oil rigs and ferries, as well as Ascension Island, thousands of miles from the UK, to accommodate vulnerable asylum seekers while their applications to come to Britain were processed.
The government is now in negotiations with the Rwandan authorities to set up a processing centre there to house people awaiting a decision on their applications.
The SNP described the plans as “inhumane” while Labour has also said the measures are “deeply shameful”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel