AN ALLY of Boris Johnson has indicated the Prime Minister “would probably” confirm if he was issued with a police fine as party of the partygate fiasco.
Policing minister Kit Malthouse also appeared to back up the assessment of two Cabinet ministers in stating that the issuing of fixed penalty notices (FPNs) this week by investigating officers was a declaration of “reasonable belief” that the law had been broken in Downing Street.
Mr Johnson has so far dodged the question, with No 10 refusing to be drawn into the discussion until the investigation has finished.
Speaking on Friday, Mr Malthouse said he acknowledged that, while police do not routinely name those who are issued with fines, the situation was “different” for politicians.
“If I got a fixed penalty notice, I would tell you,” he told LBC.
The minister was asked whether, as someone who had known the Prime Minister for two decades, Mr Johnson was likely to confirm if he receives a fine.
Mr Malthouse replied: “It is a hypothetical question, but I think if he did, he probably would, yes.”
The Metropolitan Police refused to say on Thursday whether the fixed penalty notices, which were referred to the ACRO Criminal Records Office to be doled out, had formally been issued.
However, it is not believed the Prime Minister was among those to receive a fine.
During his appearance in front of senior MPs at the Liaison Committee on Wednesday, the PM said he was “sure you would know” if he had been fined.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has called for the Prime Minister’s wife, Carrie Johnson, to be named if she receives an FPN in relation to the probe into claims of lockdown parties in Downing Street.
Sir Keir told Sky News he agreed with the “general argument” that families should not be dragged into politics, but added: “There’s a huge difference between the situation of the wife of the Prime Minister breaking the rules made by the Prime Minister and any other situation.”
Mr Malthouse, when asked if he agreed that Mrs Johnson should publicly declare any possible punishment, said that was a matter for her.
The FPNs being issued by the Met relate to investigations into around a dozen events in Downing Street and Whitehall – including one in the Prime Minister’s flat – while England was subject to coronavirus lockdown restrictions.
Although Mr Johnson was not expected to be among the first group to be hit with fines, the Met have indicated they expect to issue more fixed penalty notices as their inquiry continues.
Around 20 people were expected to be issued in the first batch of FPNs.
Justice Secretary Dominic Raab and International Trade Secretary Anne Marie Trevelyan both accepted this week that coronavirus rules had been breached in Downing Street, following the issuing of fines.
Mr Malthouse, a Minister of State in the Home Office and Ministry of Justice, said it was fair to say an FPN signalled that police believed a law had been broken.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, he said: “A fixed penalty notice means police have a reasonable belief that you’ve broken the law – you still have a right to challenge it if you want.
“Having said that, the police practice is not routinely to release the names of those who receive fixed penalties, and I don’t see why that rule should be waived for those people who may or may not be in receipt of it in Downing Street.”
Mr Malthouse said he had not personally received a fine in relation to the police probe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel