AND so the end of the partygate scandal, or rather the beginning of the end, hoves into view.
Scotland Yard at long last has announced the process has begun to issue the first fixed penalty notices following its probe into the Downing St merry-making while the nation stuck to the rules No 10 was shamelessly breaking.
The Met is investigating at least 12 events, including six Boris Johnson is thought to have attended.
The identities of those issued with fines will not be disclosed by Scotland Yard, although Downing Street has made clear it will confirm if the PM is handed one. The force will also not disclose which of the long list of parties the fines relate to.
The initial wave of fines is not expected to include the PM, who was among dozens of people issued with a police questionnaire to account for their actions, as he is contesting the allegations and took advice from his personal lawyer on how to respond.
A few months back as the political temperature rose and public disgust increased with every damaging revelation over partygate, it looked like curtains for Boris.
Douglas Ross, the Scottish Conservative leader, was at the front of the queue, demanding he go.
But as has been previously mentioned, if a sitting PM refuses to leave there is usually only one way to get rid of him or her, outwith a general election; the party has to ditch them.
While a number of letters demanding Boris’s resignation went into Sir Graham Brady, the inscrutable Chairman of the Tory 1922 backbench committee, it did not reach the magic number of 54 signatories; otherwise, we would have heard about it.
Now, it might be that that number is reached, depending on what happens with the fines ie who is fined and what new light the final report by the Whitehall mandarin Sue Gray throws on the story.
But, already, we know some Tory MPs have withdrawn their letters to the 1922, most notably Ross, in light of the need for “national unity” on the war in Ukraine. They argue now is not the time to oust a sitting PM when an ally needs to be shown total solidarity.
Indeed, even if that 54 number of signatories were reached, it would not be enough to oust Boris. A majority of Conservative MPs, 181, would need to vote to boot him out of Downing St. Which is, as things stands, an even unlikelier scenario.
Initially, Johnson repeatedly said all the lockdown rules were followed. But, clearly, they weren’t.
Then, he changed tack and sought to cover his back, insisting he had been assured that all rules had been followed. His opponents will argue the fines show the PM lied or, in parliamentary parlance, misled the Commons. But his defence will refer to the earlier point that he was told all rules had been followed, so that, yes, he misled Parliament but he did not do so knowingly.
This lunchtime, Downing St, which would not be drawn on whether Johnson would resign if fined, saying it was a “hypothetical situation,” denied the PM had deliberately misled the Commons, saying: “At all times he has set out his understanding of events.”
Earlier, Wes Streeting, the Shadow Health Secretary, claimed the Met announcement about people in Downing St being fined over partygate showed Boris was a “proven liar”.
His colleague, Angela Rayner, said the war in Ukraine should not be used as an excuse to save him.
“After over two months of police time, 12 parties investigated and over 100 people questioned under caution, Boris Johnson’s Downing Street has been found guilty of breaking the law,” declared the Labour deputy leader.
“The culture is set from the very top. The buck stops with the Prime Minister, who spent months lying to the British public, which is why he has got to go.”
A campaign group for bereaved relatives of people who died with Covid stressed how Johnson "should have resigned months ago over this".
But, of course, he won’t go.
Boris’s defence will look slippery because it is. However, the PM is determined to cling on at all costs. Perhaps only a stark revelation in the publication of the full Gray report in a few weeks’ time could tip the political balance for Tory MPs but it would have to be extremely stark.
Another positive for Johnson is that none of the alternatives - Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss, Sajid Javid - is creating a groundswell of positive opinion among Conservative backbenchers.
So, the country and the Tory Party, are, for now, stuck with Boris.
With it looking likely that the Westminster Parliament will run its full course to May 2024 when the next general election will take place, Conservative HQ will be hoping that partygate will fade from the public consciousness and there will be enough time to repair the trust that has been lost with many voters and, in parallel, to try to discredit as much as possible the alternative of Keir Starmer and the Labour Party.
As we near 2024, politics could get nastier as this process pans out while in Scotland an increasingly beleaguered Nicola Sturgeon will try to rally her troops to the Nationalist cause of Indyref2, knowing Boris will not cave in to her demand.
The last thing the PM needs is a self-created constitutional crisis at home; there are, he believes, much bigger political fish to fry; the biggest of which, of course, is saving his own premiership.
And yet if, after Gray’s full report into partygate is published, Houdini Johnson manages to escape the political shackles of the scandal, he might not escape the electoral consequences.
Boris must know that, come polling day in 2024, voters never forget. Ask John Major.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel