HISTORY shows us what happens if we don’t take adequate action against a tyrannical regime or dictator. It will almost certainly result in a humanitarian crisis and that is exactly what we are seeing in Ukraine. We know that unless Putin understands that the international community won’t tolerate his war in Ukraine, and potentially neighbouring countries, the situation will almost certainly get worse.
I’m not saying we should adopt a gung-ho approach to military action but as a country we must be prepared to defend what we believe in. The first option should always be to seek a diplomatic solution to any crisis.
It breaks my heart watching images of fathers having to say their goodbyes to their children as they stay back to fight – not knowing when they will next see their loved ones or what will happen.
We know from previous conflicts that unless we take a stance the current humanitarian crisis will only get worse, which will have far reaching consequences for the international community.
Cast your mind back to 2015 when the UK government debated whether or not to deploy troops to Syria which was voted down. In many respects this was a result of the aftermath of the war in Iraq which left the United Kingdom with a confidence issue when it came to taking military action. It can be argued that had the UK taken decisive military action against President Assad the world wouldn’t have then witnessed the global humanitarian crisis.
I was a staunch critic of taking military action back then but when it comes to geo-politics taking no action can be as bad as being too keen to deploy troops.
This is certainly not a decision that many of us would want to have to take but it is what we expect from our leaders. It’s time that Johnson and the Conservatives really came down hard on sanctions against Russia, Putin and his cronies as what they have put forward won’t even touch the sides. If we are serious about standing up to Putin then we have to be serious in how we sanction Russia. If that doesn’t work then other options will have to be considered.
It’s hard not to think of the human loss that is likely to increase but the resolve of the Ukrainian people cannot be underestimated. They have my solidarity but I can’t help think of previous humanitarian tragedies that we have seen as a result of war. What still sticks in my mind is the picture of the young boy lying dead on a beach in Turkey as he was fleeing war torn Syria with his family for a safer life.
Just think about that for a moment and let it sink in. Then ask yourself why Johnson and the Conservatives are not doing more to support those people in Ukraine who through Putin’s actions have now ended up being refugees.
Johnson talks a good game but like all politicians will be judged on what they do and not what they say as often the rhetoric and the policy don’t match up.
The offer of giving refugees from Ukraine a visa to the UK if they have family is a contradiction in terms. It speaks volumes about this Conservative government who on numerous occasions have spoken about 'compassionate conservatism' which is nothing more than a weak soundbite that everyone can see through.
If this government were serious about sanctioning Putin they would give the money that they received from Russian donors to humanitarian charities. They would take inspiration from the European Union who have given Ukrainian refugees the right to live in the EU for three years, no gimmicks, no soundbites, a people orientated policy that will assist them in finding refuge.
I want to see the UK do more than just talk about it.
Barrie Cunning is managing director of Pentland Communications and a former Scottish Labour Parliamentary candidate
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel