BEING a glass-half-full sort of a chiel, I’m eager to look at the positives in Scottish Labour’s re-branding effort revealed yesterday. Admittedly, you have to look very hard but if you stick with it there are one or two.
Let me say straight off: I’m all in favour of sans serif faces on my logos and it’s pleasing that Scottish Labour have adopted this no-nonsense approach to their typography. It conveys a sense of purpose and solidarity that’s often lacking in your fey and flibbertigibbet Times Roman serif kind of a font.
Your sans letterforms always look like they’re here to do business and get their sleeves rolled up. Serif faces are all fine and dandy for wedding invitations and gender-reveal parties but I’m not sure there’s a place for them in the pitiless world of Scottish politics.
And might there be a wee all-inclusive, non-binary aesthetic going on with Scottish Labour’s new badge? We can only hope.
And then there’s the inclusion of a thistle on the new logo. Here, I must commend the party’s bravery. For the last 15 years, Scottish Labour have wrapped themselves so tightly in the Union Jack that exposure to anything remotely Scottish can bring them out in a dose of the hives.
The party’s Scottish leader, Anas Sarwar plans to unveil the new logo to the faithful this Friday at the start of their national conference. I’d advise caution and taking it slowly. Maybe just divulge it in stages: the top part on day one and the middle and bottom sections gradually in darkened rooms over subsequent days.
To read the rest of this analysis, sign up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and get unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel