SCOTLAND and Wales are going to offer Covid-19 jags to children aged five to 11.
Here are the answers to some of the key questions about vaccines for younger children.
What is the latest?
Ministers in Wales and Scotland have said they have seen guidance from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) which advises that children in this age group should be offered the vaccine.
As a result, they have decided to press ahead with offering Covid-19 jabs to children aged five to 11.
The JCVI guidance is yet to officially be published but is expected soon.
Did jabs not get approved for use in five to 11-year-olds in December?
The usual protocol for vaccine approval starts with the UK medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which confirms whether or not a vaccine is safe and effective after looking at all of the data submitted by pharmaceutical companies.
Vaccination experts on the JCVI then assess this data and other factors - in this case school absences and rates of infection - before they advise ministers as to whether they should offer a vaccine. Ministers then announce their decision.
The MHRA announced in December that a special "paediatric formulation" of the Pfizer/BioNtech Covid-19 vaccine was safe for use among children aged five to 11.
The JCVI then said that the vaccine could be offered to "at risk" children in this age group, but reserved its decision on wider use among this cohort. Its official announcement is expected later on Wednesday.
What is going on with the differnces in government stances across the UK?
In this case, it appears that the JCVI guidance has been given to ministers but not yet been announced.
A bit of political wrangling in Westminster could be to blame and it may be that Whitehall officials wanted to announce the decision on offering jabs for five to 11-year-olds when then set out their Living With Covid plans next week.
Now Wales and Scotland have jumped the gun on the announcement, it has forced the hand of Westminster officials and the JCVI decision is expected to be published on Wednesday. Announcements from ministers in England and Northern Ireland will follow.
Can you tell me more about this "paediatric formulation"?
Children aged five to 11 will be offered a much lower dose of the vaccine - lower than that offered to adults or children aged 12 and over.
They will be offered a 10 micrograms dose compared with 30 micrograms.
The MHRA said the vaccine is given as two injections in the upper arm. It will be for the JCVI to make the final recommendation on the so-called dosing interval - or how far apart the vaccines should take place.
Are there any side effects?
When the MHRA approved the vaccine for younger children it said that its review of side effects found that the "overwhelming majority" were mild, including a sore arm and flu-like illness.
It examined lots of data, including information from the US where millions of children aged five to 11 have been vaccinated. The jab has also been on offer to this age group in a number of countries around the world.
Where will children be given jabs?
It has not yet been announced where children will be vaccinated.
Children aged 12 and over and vulnerable five to 11-year-olds have been able to use NHS facilities and some schools have been used as vaccination sites.
How many children will be offered the jab?
There are an estimated 5.8 million five to 11-year-olds in the UK.
Of course some of these will have already been offered a chance to have a vaccine if they are in vulnerable groups.
Will children under the age of five ever be offered the jab?
It is a possibility but those decisions are a long way off.
The UK has taken time to weigh up the risks and benefits of vaccinations for children and often taken much longer than some other western countries to confirm it is happy for its youngest citizens to get a Covid jab.
Last week the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it needed more data before considering whether children aged six months to four years should be offered the Pfizer vaccine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel