HOLYROOD has launched an audit on the representation and participation of women in the Scottish Parliament in a push for more gender balance.
The work will cover the number and position of female MSPs, interventions in the chamber as well as the impact of parliamentary procedures and policies.
Despite the intention of Holyrood to be a more inclusive and provide a more family-friendly working environment, women have never made up 50% of MSPs.
Growing pressure on political parties led them last year to introduce a range of measures to try to address the issue including all-women shortlists for constituency selection contests, and zipped lists - where female and male candidates are alternated.
These initiatives lead to a record number of women being elected to the Scottish Parliament in May, with 58 female MSPs winning seats - up from 45 in the 2016 to 2021 session.
Holyrood's Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone
It means they currently account for 45% of the country's 129 MSPs. The SNP's Kaukab Stewart of the SNP and Conservative Pam Gosal also became the first women of colour to be elected.
The SNP now has 34 women, Labour have 10, the Conservatives have eight, the Scottish Greens have five and the Lib Dems have one female MSP.
The SNP executive committee used all-women lists in nine different areas where former MSPs stood down, while Labour sought to promote women by "zipping" candidates, alternating men and women on their regional lists.
Anas Sarwar, as Scottish Labour leader, should have topped the Glasgow list. However, the party instead positioned Pauline McNeill as the first candidate.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and Kaukab Stewart greeting each other outside the count in Glasgow last May. Ms Stewart was elected as one of two women of colour to Holyrood in May. Photo Colin Mearns/The Herald.
Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone MS said: "Last May’s election returned our most representative and diverse Parliament to date. We know, though, from viewing the Parliament’s make up from 1999 until now, that this welcome progress can’t be taken for granted.
"This is an important opportunity to have a broad look at how the Parliament takes account of barriers to equal representation in its work.”
Fiona Mackay, Professor of Politics at the University of Edinburgh and one of the academic advisers to the board overseeing the research, said: "When the Scottish Parliament was created in 1999, it was internationally praised for its world-leading levels of women’s representation, and its attention to equal opportunities and participation.
"Now is a good time to take stock. This audit, based on a well-tested comparative framework, will let us know how well Scotland has done over the long haul. And, crucially, what work still needs to be done to make it an inclusive parliament for the 21st Century.”
Eilidh Dickson, Policy and Parliamentary Manager for the feminist organisation Engender, said: “Women are underrepresented in almost all areas of our democracy, resulting in policy decisions which not only ignore women, but actively deepen inequality.
"By examining the make-up of committees, gathering data on who is being invited to give evidence, and understanding where gender mainstreaming is being ignored, we can work towards a Scottish Parliament which can act as an exemplar for women’s equality."
Work on the audit will begin immediately with a report detailing recommendations for improvement due by the end of 2022.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel