The United States and Russia have sought to lower the temperature in a heated stand-off over Ukraine, even as they said no breakthrough was imminent in the crisis that has raised fears of a possible Russian invasion.
Armed with seemingly intractable and diametrically opposed demands, US secretary of state Antony Blinken and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov met in Geneva, Switzerland, at what the American said was a "critical moment".
With an estimated 100,000 Russian troops massed near Ukraine, many fear Moscow is preparing an invasion, although Russia denies that.
The US and its allies are scrambling to present a united front to prevent that or co-ordinate a tough response if they cannot.
"We didn't expect any major breakthroughs to happen today, but I believe we are now on a clearer path to understanding each other's positions," Mr Blinken told reporters after the meeting.
Mr Blinken said Mr Lavrov repeated Russia's insistence that it has no plans to invade Ukraine but he stressed that the US and its allies were not convinced of that.
"We're looking at what is visible to all, and it is deeds and actions and not words that make all the difference," he said.
Mr Lavrov, meanwhile, called the talks "constructive and useful" and said that the US agreed to provide written responses to Russian demands on Ukraine and Nato next week. That could at least delay any imminent aggression for a few days.
But Lavrov declined to characterise that pledge.
"I can't say whether we are on the right track or not," he told reporters. "We will understand that when we receive the US written response to all of our proposals."
Moscow has demanded that the Nato alliance promise that Ukraine - a former Soviet republic - will never be allowed to join. It also wants the allies to remove troops and military equipment from parts of eastern Europe.
The US and its Nato allies have flatly rejected those demands and say that Russian President Vladimir Putin knows they are non-starters. They have said they are open to less dramatic moves.
Mr Blinken said the US would be open to a meeting between Mr Putin and US President Joe Biden, if it would be "useful and productive".
Washington and its allies have repeatedly promised "severe" consequences such as tough economic sanctions - though not military action - against Russia if an invasion goes ahead.
Mr Blinken repeated that warning on Friday before the talks.
He said the US and its allies were committed to diplomacy, but also committed "if that proves impossible, and Russia decides to pursue aggression against Ukraine, to a united, swift and severe response".
But he said he also wanted to use the opportunity to share directly with Mr Lavrov some "concrete ideas to address some of the concerns that you have raised, as well as the deep concerns that many of us have about Russia's actions".
Ukraine is already beset by conflict. Russia seized control of Ukraine's Crimea Peninsula in 2014 and backed a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine, part of a simmering but largely stalemated conflict with Ukrainian forces that has claimed more than 14,000 lives.
Mr Putin faced limited international consequences for those moves, but the West says a new invasion would be different.
Ahead of his meeting with Mr Lavrov, Mr Blinken met Ukraine's president in Kyiv and top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany in Berlin this week.
Adding to its repeated verbal warnings to Russia, the United States stepped up sanctions on Thursday.
The US treasury department slapped new measures on four Ukrainian officials. Mr Blinken said the four were at the centre of a Kremlin effort which began in 2020 to damage Ukraine's ability to "independently function".
The Russian foreign ministry reaffirmed its demands on Friday that Nato not expand into Ukraine, that no alliance weapons be deployed near Russian borders and that alliance forces pull back from Central and Eastern Europe.
The US state department, meanwhile, put out three statements - two on Russian "disinformation", including specifically on Ukraine, and another entitled Taking Action to Expose and Disrupt Russia's Destabilisation Campaign in Ukraine.
The documents accused Russia and Mr Putin of trying to reconstitute the former Soviet Union through intimidation and force.
The Russian foreign ministry mocked those statements, saying they must have been prepared by an Orwellian Ministry of Truth, and Mr Lavrov caustically dismissed them.
"I do hope that not everyone in the state department was working on those materials and there were some who were working on the essence of our proposals and their substance," he said.
The Russian Foreign Ministry also rejected Western claims that Moscow was trying to rebuild the Soviet empire and carve out its zone of influence in Eastern Europe, charging that it is the West that thinks in categories of zones of influence.
Mr Blinken has taken pains to stress US unity with its allies in opposition to a possible Russian invasion, something that took an apparent hit earlier this week when Mr Biden drew widespread criticism for saying retaliation for Russian aggression in Ukraine would depend on the details and that a "minor incursion" could prompt discord among Western allies.
On Thursday, Mr Biden sought to clarify his comments by cautioning that any Russian troop movements across Ukraine's border would constitute an invasion and that Moscow would "pay a heavy price" for such an action.
"I've been absolutely clear with President Putin," Mr Biden said. "He has no misunderstanding: Any, any assembled Russian units move across the Ukrainian border, that is an invasion."
Russia has denied it is planning an invasion and instead accused the West of plotting "provocations" in Ukraine, citing the delivery of weapons to the country by British military transport planes in recent days.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here