US secretary of state Antony Blinken has warned that a stand-off over Ukraine is at a "critical moment" as he headed into talks with his Russian counterpart amid rising concerns that Europe could again be beset by war.
Mr Blinken and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov lowered expectations ahead of the meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, with each saying in his own way that the talks were only one step.
With 100,000 Russian troops amassed near the Ukrainian border, many fear Moscow is preparing to invade.
The US and its allies are scrambling to present a united front to hopefully prevent that or co-ordinate a response if they cannot.
"We don't expect to resolve our differences here today. But I do hope and expect that we can test whether the path of diplomacy or dialogue remains open," Mr Blinken told Mr Lavrov. "This is a critical moment."
Mr Lavrov, meanwhile, said he did not "expect a breakthrough at these negotiations either".
He added: "What we expect is concrete answers to our concrete proposals."
Moscow has demanded concessions from Nato over the western alliance's relationship with Ukraine, a former Soviet republic.
Washington and its allies have repeatedly promised "severe" consequences such as tough economic sanctions - though not military action - against Russia if an invasion goes ahead.
Mr Blinken repeated that warning on Friday. He said the US and its allies were committed to diplomacy, but were also committed, "if that proves impossible, and Russia decides to pursue aggression against Ukraine, to a united, swift and severe response".
But he said he also wanted to use the opportunity to share directly with Mr Lavrov some "concrete ideas to address some of the concerns that you have raised, as well as the deep concerns that many of us have about Russia's actions".
After meeting with Ukraine's president in Kyiv and top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany in Berlin this week, Mr Blinken faces Mr Lavrov in a meeting that is shaping up as a possible last-ditch effort at dialogue and a negotiated agreement - but both sides sticking to so-far irreconcilable red lines.
On Thursday in Berlin, Mr Blinken warned of a "swift, severe" response from the US and its allies if an invasion is launched, and the US treasury department slapped new sanctions on four Ukrainian officials.
Mr Blinken said the four were at the centre of a Kremlin effort which began in 2020 to damage Ukraine's ability to "independently function".
Mr Blinken took pains to stress US unity with its allies in opposition to a possible Russian invasion - and tried to do just that on Thursday, a day after US President Joe Biden drew widespread criticism for saying retaliation for Russian aggression in Ukraine would depend on the details and that a "minor incursion" could prompt discord among Western allies.
On Thursday, Mr Biden cautioned that any Russian troop movements across Ukraine's border would constitute an invasion and that Moscow would "pay a heavy price" for such an action.
"I've been absolutely clear with President Putin," Mr Biden said. "He has no misunderstanding: Any, any assembled Russian units move across the Ukrainian border, that is an invasion."
Russia has denied it is planning an invasion and instead accused the West on Thursday of plotting "provocations" in Ukraine, citing the delivery of weapons to the country by British military transport planes in recent days.
Russia wants binding security guarantees, including a permanent prohibition on Ukrainian membership in Nato, to which Kyiv aspires, and the removal of most of the US and allied military presence in eastern Europe.
The US and its European partners say they are willing to consider certain less-dramatic gestures but that the Russian demands are out of the question and that Vladimir Putin knows they are non-starters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel