AFTER a week of hearing about a Pork Pie Plot and Operation Red Meat, it was time for the silly burger leading the country to explain himself – again.
However, before Boris Johnson could ululate, in a stormy but curiously jocular Prime Minister’s Questions, he’d to thole the spectacle of Tory defector Christian Wakeford, in Union Jack facemask, crossing the floor to sit behind Keir Starmer on the opposition Labour benches. Cue Loud cheering and waving of order papers.
Welcoming him, Sir Keir said: “The Labour Party has changed – and so has the Conservative Party.”
Yes, the former is now both woke and patriotic, like being vegan apart from the bacon butties, while the latter’s massive public spending programme has made it virtually socialist. It’s very confusing.
However, we mustn’t let party politics cloud the issue of the day: the politics of parties. Sir K rehearsed the whole “absurd and unbelievable” timeline of Boris’s narrative: there were no parties; there were parties but he didn’t know about them; he knew about them but didn’t attend them; he attended one but didn’t know it was a party, confusing it with work (easily done); and, having drawn up rules about this sort of thing, no one told him what these rules were.
Sir Keir, a former director of public prosecutions, concluded: “No defence is going to work for him.”
That was after a markedly irritated Mr Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, had threatened to “direct people out of the chamber”, addressing his remarks – as every week – to a noisy Tory Ultras group (they’ll be setting off flares next) over to his right.
Sir Keir observed: “I’m sure the Chief Whip has ordered them to bring their own booze.”
And what of Boris during all this? Well, he looked surprisingly confident, almost unruffled in his ruffled way, with his green tie twisted like a badly knotted noose. At first, he trotted out his usual tropes about vaccine successes and Sue Gray’s inquiry.
Then he addressed the defection: “As for Bury South” – suddenly the place went silent, as sometimes happens strangely in a primary school class or among a flock of starlings – “we will win again at … the next election.”
Will ye, aye?
Mr Starmer laughed at Boris’s “carefully crafted explanation”, as regards staff warning him about parties, adding: “It almost sounded like a lawyer wrote it.”
To more titters, he averred of the PM: “He alone, as he waded through the empty bottles and platters of sandwiches, didn’t realise it was a party.”
That was a tat just waiting for a tit and, accordingly, Boris called on the Labour leader to explain “the picture of him drinking a pint of beer” in an office. The PM added: “He is wasting this House’s time. He is wasting the people’s time.” Yes, and it was nearly wine o’clock.
After that small beer, Sir Keir shot back: “I know it’s not going well, Prime Minister, but look on the bright side – at least the staff at Number 10 know how to pack a suitcase.”
This alluded to a suitcase of booze brought into Downing Street, with the cheeky insinuation that it’d soon be full of prime ministerial pants and socks as the PM vacated the premises.
Talking pants brings us to Ian Blackford, the SNP’s Westminster leader, who said Operation Big Dog had become “a dog’s dinner”, and accused Boris of “laughing at the British public”. Crivvens, at this rate Ian’ll soon be turning up with a Union Jack mask too.
However, the day’s most dramatic intervention came when one of Boris’s own stood up to plunge in the knife. “Et tu, Davis?” Boris might have cried as David of that ilk, a former Brexit Minister, accused the PM of failing to shoulder his responsibilities.
He quoted, or at least paraphrased, words “all together too familiar to him” from Conservative Leo Amery to Neville Chamberlain (these in turn echoing words of Cromwell to the Long Parliament): “You have sat there too long for all the good you have done. In the name of God, go!”
Boris, a scholar of the Churchill-Chamberlain period, riposted cleverly: “I must say to the right honourable gentleman I don’t know what he’s talking about. I don’t know what quotation he’s alluding to.”
Finally, as regards our Mother Scotia, Labour’s Stephen Kinnock asked the PM if he agreed with Leader of the House, Jacob Rees-Mogg, that Scottish Tory chief Douglas Ross was a “lightweight”. Boris body-swerved that, but praised the Scottish Conservatives’ “stout defence” of the Union. And there we end these observations on the latest session of Lightweight Watchers.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel