SCOTTISH Labour have demanded an emergency statement at Holyrood over a looming “fiasco” related to new fire and smoke alarm laws.
The party said an SNP minister needed to explain the changes facing homeowners when new laws on interlinked alarms come into force on February 1.
Labour claimed the new legislation had been beset by problems, including a lack of public awareness, affordability worries, and even a shortage of equipment.
Age Scotland also called for a further one-year delay to the law, saying there was "no chance" that most privaate homes were compliant.
The Scottish Government had been due to bring in the new regulations on fire and smoke alarms last February, but postponed it for a year, ostensibly because of the pandemic.
However there had also been a political backlash to the plan, which was prompted by the Grenfell Tower tragedy, and which campaigners said caught people by surprise.
Under the changes, all homes must have interlinked fire and smoke alarms, plus carbon monoxide alarms where required, with the costs at least £200.
Failure to install the alarms could invalidate people’s home insurance.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon signals one-year delay to new smoke and fire alarms in the home
READ MORE: New Scottish smoke alarm law: What do I need to do?
Labour said Government failure to promote the changes and ready the public meant hundreds of thousands of households could still fall short of the standards next month.
Scottish Labour MSP Mark Griffin said: “The SNP need to deal with this fiasco.
“We are now just two weeks away from these rules hitting homeowners, potentially making their home insurance worthless.
“It beggars belief that the SNP are still refusing to consider a delay, despite mounting chaos around the new rules.
“Most homeowners don’t even know these law exist, and those who do are being hit by supply shortages and hefty bills.
“The SNP cannot keep ignoring the mess they have made of this policy. They need to give an urgent statement to Parliament this week so we can get the answers homeowners need.”
Age Scotland chief executive Brian Sloan said: “It has become abundantly clear that a further extension to this deadline is needed.
More than a year ago we said to the Scottish Government that they needed to 'reset the clock' on this work as the original two years lead time had been lost, and nothing that we have seen or heard in the last few months leads us to believe that this isn’t still needed.
"There is no chance that the vast majority of private residences have had this work done, and as the deadline looms the very foreseeable challenges people face to have these alarms fitted within a year, in the volume required, and with the backdrop of Covid-19 remain.
"Issues surrounding supply and availability of the devices, affordability, support to fit the alarms, and the risk of scams associated with the work have been raised regularly with our helpline over the last year.
"There has also been growing anxiety about letting tradespeople into their homes as the new Covid-19 variant spreads.
“While the fire safety improvements are important, when you consider the incredibly low awareness and compliance a year ago, the late starting national PR campaign, and the lack of clarity on home insurance implications, it was far too ambitious to expect this to have been completed in a year.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: This legislation was introduced to protect lives and property following the tragic Grenfell fire, ensuring that owner-occupied and social rented homes meet exactly the same standards already in place in new build properties and the private rental sector.
“We have engaged throughout the legislative process with the Association of British Insurers who advise member firms are aware of the upcoming changes to fire alarms legislation from February 2022 and have indicated that insurers may ask a customer questions about whether the property is fitted with working fire alarms, but are not likely to ask questions about specific standards.
“Anyone who is unclear on their policy terms and conditions in relation to the new law in Scotland should speak to their insurer.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel