WHEN both sides of Scotland’s political divide line up against an idea, you know it’s probably half decent. British nationalists and Scottish nationalists have been falling over themselves to attack the recent floating of the suggestion that any future referendum on independence contains a third option: ‘Devo Max’.
Full transparency as always with me: regular readers will know I’m a moderate supporter of independence. I would like to see Scotland go it alone, free from Westminster - an institution that’s been rotten to the core for the 50 years I’ve been on this planet. However, the SNP has to fundamentally remake the case for separation. The prospectus is so weak it should be on life support, with unanswered questions ranging from borders to the EU and from defence to currency.
I’d want to see a new prospectus which fully and honestly addresses these difficult points before I would vote Yes a second time. Failure to do so, would probably guarantee my abstention. There’s nothing fundamentalist or nationalist about my personal politics, and I would not use my vote to sell Scotland into a half-baked fantasy world that did nothing but satisfy the SNP. Like many, my Yes vote is contingent upon the SNP satisfying my existing concerns.
There’s an outrageous sense of entitlement among these British and Scottish nationalists saying ‘No’ to the concept of a Devo Max box on the ballot paper. It is not for them to decide what’s best for the rest of us. They aren’t gods or princes here to decree from on high what our choices in life must be; the arrogance and authoritarianism is astonishing.
To read the rest of this analysis, sign up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and get unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel