THE deputy leader of the Alba Party has said it will target the SNP in May’s council elections, calling its policies authoritarian, harmful, and "fraudulent" over independence.
Former Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said Alba would demand a renewed push for independence after it had been “abandoned by the SNP”.
Accusing Nicola Sturgeon’s party of stringing Yes supporters along with talk of a negotiated referendum that never comes because Boris Johnson refuses to grant it, he said “other routes must now be used”, including a national convention on independence.
The East Lothian MP also said Alba councillors would be more forceful in standing up for local government rather than SNP ones who had been silent and “submissive”.
Mr MacAskill, who defected from the SNP to Alex Salmond’s rival Yes party when it was launched last year, makes the comments in the new edition of the Scottish Left Review.
He mentions the SNP more than he does Alba in his 950-word article, which mentions the Tories only once, and Labour, the Greens and Liberal Democrats not at all.
After Alba failed to get any MSPs elected at last year’s Scottish election, it immediately turned its attention to the council vote in the hope of making a breakthrough.
However the council voting system is even harder to crack for a small party than Holyrood’s, meaning Alba must try to win over large numbers of SNP voters to stand a chance.
Mr MAcAskill said the elections would be “challenging” but also a “great opportunity for a still fledgling party”, which was now stronger and better organised that it was last year.
“As Alba strengthens, it is often at the expense of others, especially the SNP,” he said.
“Alba’s principal call will be for a galvanisation of the push for independence that has been abandoned by the SNP.
“A ‘neverendum’ was meant to be a pejorative remark from a unionist but has become the policy of the Scottish Government. Talk of a referendum in 2023 is fraudulent and not just fanciful. It’s why other routes must now be used.
“A national convention that should have been called after Johnson’s rejection at the polls in Scotland back in 2019 is now required more than ever.
“The local elections allow a platform for that call to be made and for a convention to encompass not just MPs and MSPs but also councillors. That convention can be the basis not simply to drive forward the push for independence but coordinate opposition to cuts and threats from a Government which Scotland has comprehensively rejected.”
He said Alba would challenge a Scottish Government which had “consciously taken action that is harmful and authoritarian”, citing gender reform, rail cuts, council cuts, a lack of deliver green jobs, and remote communities let down by problems with CalMac ferries.
He wrote: “Alba councillors will also reject the supine acceptance of Scottish Government diktat that has been the hallmark of most SNP administrations.
“Supporting a government is one thing but selling out your community quite another.
“Yet in cuts or the imposition of policies, SNP councillors and especially SNP councils have been marked by their silence and submissiveness.
“The people of Scotland are crying out for action. People are being hurt and the threat faced is severe. Alba goes into these elections with hope and optimism, seeking to galvanise the radical call for independence that ignited our country in 2014 and which has been allowed to dissipate. It’s that radical vision that’s required and it’s that - along with protecting sex-based rights and defending our communities - which Alba will articulate over coming months.”
The SNP was asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel