Downing Street secretly hired a US law firm to advise on how much trouble Bill Clinton was in over the Monica Lewinsky affair ahead of Tony Blair’s first visit to the White House.
The PM flew to Washington in February 1998 at the height of special prosecutor Kenneth Starr’s wide-ranging investigation into the conduct of Mr Clinton and his wife Hillary.
Mr Blair earned the thanks of the Clinton administration after using a joint press conference to declare his support for the embattled US president.
But National Archives files show that behind the scenes in No 10 worried Mr Blair could be damaged by association.
Jonathan Powell, the PM’s chief of staff, took the precaution of hiring a Washington law firm, Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan LLP, to advise on the president’s legal predicament, and whether he might be charged with perjury when he denied having sexual relations with intern Ms Lewinsky.
Despite warnings about Mr Starr's determination to "get something on" Mr Clinton, Mr Blair publicly called him “someone I can trust, someone I can rely upon, someone I am proud to call not just a colleague but a friend”.
British ambassador Sir Christopher Meyer said the public show of support had created “a lot of British credit in the American bank”.
He reported to the UK: "The tension shown by Clinton and his staff before the press conference was only matched by their relief afterwards.
“Clinton was at his Houdini best. The Prime Minister was firm in his support for Clinton.
“There is criticism in the UK that Mr Blair has put too many eggs in Clinton’s basket. But this misses the point. The White House… and even the Republicans will have noted with approval that the Prime Minister has stayed loyal to a friend in trouble.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel