ELTON John’s iconic performance of Candle in the Wind at the funeral of Princess Diana almost never took place because of misgivings within the Royal household.
Newly released files from the National Archives reveal the Dean of Westminster personally appealed to Buckingham Palace to allow it.
Anything classical or choral would be “inappropriate”, the Very Rev Dr Wesley Carr suggested.
Sir Elton’s performance was one of the most memorable moments of the service at Westminster Abbey and the single went on to sell 33 million copies worldwide.
However there was initial resistance to the plan amid fears the reworked lyrics by Sir Elton and his songwriting partner Bernie Taupin were “too sentimental”.
The Abbey arranged for a young saxophonist to be put on standby to deliver a solo instrumental version of the song, although this was seen as a “very second best shot”.
In the end, the Dean successfully argued that allowing Sir Elton to appear would be an “imaginative and generous” gesture to the public who had turned against the royal family in the days following the princess’s death in Paris in 1997.
Diana’s divorce from the Prince of Wales was finalised the previous year and there was widespread public anger at the perceived indifference of the royals to her fate.
Candle In The Wind, originally written in memory of Marilyn Monroe, was taken up and played as a memorial to the princess, who had been a friend of Sir Elton.
In response, he and Mr Taupin rewrote the lyrics, changing the opening line from “Goodbye Norma Jean” (Monroe’s real name) to “Goodbye England’s rose”.
In a note to a senior member of the royal household, Lieutenant Colonel Malcolm Ross, Dr Carr - who was involved in negotiations over the service between the Palace and Diana’s family - said it had captured the public mood.
“This is a crucial point in the service and we would urge boldness. It is where the unexpected happens and something of the modern world that the princess represented.
“I respectfully suggest that anything classical or choral (even a popular classic such as something by Lloyd Webber) is inappropriate.
“Better would be the enclosed song by Elton John (known to millions and his music was enjoyed by the princess), which would be powerful. He has written new words to the tune which is being widely played and sung throughout the nation in memorial to Diana.
"It is all the time on the radio. Its use here would be imaginative and generous to the millions who are feeling personally bereaved: it is popular culture at its best.
“If it were thought the words too sentimental (although that is by no means a bad thing given the national mood), they need not be printed – only sung.
“I would be prepared to discuss the significance of this suggestion over the phone with anyone.”
The note, which was copied to No 10, is included in Downing Street files released by the National Archives, although there is no record of the reply.
The papers also show the Abbey originally believed Sir Elton intended to sing Your Song, which was wrongly listed as Our Song on a draft order of service, and called “a different style of music, popular and associated with the princess”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here