Summer 1992. The Queen of the Netherlands is visiting Scotland to open an exhibition of Dutch masters at the National Gallery but she doesn’t just want to see museums and castles – what’s a castle to a queen? - she also wants to see the real Scotland; she wants to see what life can be like for people, especially people struggling with deprivation; she wants to see a place in Glasgow called Castlemilk.
And so that is what the Queen does. She eschews the big houses and beauty spots lined up by British officials and instead pops into The Jeely Piece Club, a charity that helps children living on the estate, where she samples one of the famous pieces. Very nice, she thinks. But the Queen is also shocked by what she sees around her. The deprivation. The poverty. The reality.
The extent of her shock was revealed in a report from the British Embassy in the Hague, which was written after the visit and has only now been released, 30 years on. “The Dutch visitors,” said the report, “were struck by how less prosperous certain parts of Scotland, such as Glasgow, appeared to be than the level of prosperity they normally encountered in England.”
In some ways, the royal comparison was unfair – comparing the poorest parts of Scotland with prosperous parts of England is always going to look more shocking than comparing regions that are dealing with similar issues. By the 1990s, Castlemilk was also dealing with a problem faced by many other parts of the UK, which is that well-meaning schemes dreamed up in the 60s had turned out not to be so good after all and were badly managed. Castlemilk wasn’t, and isn’t, unique.
But the uncomfortable truth is that, should the Dutch royal family come to visit Scotland again, they’d discover not only that the problem of poverty is still serious but that it has in fact got worse. Since 2015, child poverty has risen in every one of Scotland’s council areas, and all the other problems associated with poverty have also worsened. Homelessness. Worse. Drug deaths. Worse. Alcohol deaths. Worse. If you thought poverty was bad in the 90s, how about now?
What makes the situation even more troubling, I think, is that the Scottish Government has said poverty is actually its priority at the same time that poverty has got worse. I spoke to Jim Sillars about this recently and his verdict was scathing. “We’ve declared war on poverty so many times and have been defeated so many times but don’t admit it,” he told me. He also had some choice words to say about the government’s performance on education, health and housing, all of which boiled down to: it’s got worse, much worse.
One thing the First Minister could do in response – and it strikes me as extraordinary that she hasn’t – is visibly, publicly and practically prioritise poverty by regularly visiting places like Castlemilk as well as other parts of the country struggling with deprivation. In that sense, she could learn a lesson from the Queen of the Netherlands. Get out there. Go and look. And then do something.
To be fair, there are some signs Sturgeon may be listening. Her recent visit to the drug recovery centre in Haghill, for example, was a good idea. The Government also seems to have – finally, finally – accepted the argument that allowing the number of rehab places to decline in Scotland was a catastrophe and it has promised to spend £100million on rehab in the next five years. There is only one possible verdict on that: better late than never.
But it’s also striking how little the First Minister seems to talk about poverty, given that it is apparently one of her priorities. Perhaps she might feel more inclined to do so if she visited more places affected by it. So, I would like to invite her, here and now, to visit the village where I live, which is one of the poorest in Scotland. Come down to New Cumnock First Minister and see it for yourself. There’s been a lot of progress here but there’s still a lot to do. We could do with your help.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel