THE SNP Government should carry out a full three-year spending review to boost transparency around the Budget and use its extra £3.9 billion it will receive to repair damaged communities, Labour has claimed.
Scottish Labour’s finance spokesperson, Daniel Johnson, has called for a comprehensive spending review, mirroring the Treasury process for the UK, to take place – which he said would form “a plan for three years of spending”.
He added that the process would provide “line by line” evidence of where public money is being spent.
Scotland’s Finance Secretary, Kate Forbes, is due to deliver her Budget on Thursday and Mr Johnson said knowing where all the money goes would help to “make sure every penny is spent wisely”.
The Scottish Government has never undertaken a comprehensive spending review despite them being carried out by the Treasury on UK Government spending approximately every three years.
Mr Johnson argued that a spending review would allow the Government to understand where money was being spent successfully and where spending had failed to deliver its intended aims.
The Government should also be able to provide estimates of what it expected to spend in the following two years, something he suggested would give clarity and stability to public budgets such as those of councils and the police.
Mr Johnson said: “After 14 years, the gap between the SNP’s rhetoric and reality on investing in Scotland’s future is eye-watering.
“To jumpstart a meaningful recovery from the pandemic and invest in an ambitious future, we’ve got to make sure every penny is spent wisely.
“The SNP’s broken financial promises have smothered Scotland’s potential for too long. We need an ambitious Budget with clear priorities for Scotland’s recovery.
“We need a clear picture of what we are trying to achieve – and if it’s working.
“Transparency and efficiency must be at the heart of our economic recovery. The days of short-term thinking must end.
“That’s why, as we approach this Budget, Labour will be focused on schemes that can unlock Scotland’s potential and get (us) back on the road to recovery.”
Mr Johnson also said the Scottish Government would have a “pretty substantial envelope” of additional funding, with at least £3.9 billion extra expected to be available from Barnett consequentials as a result of UK Government spending decisions.
Suggesting that some of the additional money should be given to councils to tackle the problems of rubbish in the streets and potholes in the roads, Mr Johnson added: “I think the way (the Scottish Government) has treated local government since the SNP came to office has left local government in an invidious position.
“Frankly, they’ve left our roads in a dreadful state and rubbish uncollected, and I think there needs to be some pretty urgent action to put those things right.”
He added: “I think Kate Forbes has two options. She can look across her Budget lines from last year and increment them up a bit, giving in to her Cabinet colleagues.
“Or she can look at the Budget and the envelope of £3.9 billion of cash that is there from the (UK) comprehensive spending review and say ‘what can we do, what interventions can we make to get the recovery back on track and build the resilience that we need?’.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel