LORDS have denounced the Conservative Government’s attempts to change the way MPs are investigated for breaking the rules.
Labour peer George Foulkes said the Houses of Parliament were at risk of becoming a “laughing stock around the world” after the Tories’ efforts last week.
Lord Foulkes, a former Scotland office minister and MSP, challenged the government over the debacle, which Tory ministers have acknowledged was a "mistake".
He said: "The ways in which the Prime Minister dealt with the Hancock affair, the Jenrick planning fiasco and the Priti Patel bullying saga—where the wrong person resigned—were not exactly models of integrity and transparency”
He urged Cabinet Office minister Nicholas True to ensure the Ministerial code had “statutory underpinning” adding: “The independent adviser should be given some real powers before our parliamentary democracy becomes a laughing stock around the world.”
Lord True said it was the Prime Minister’s responsibility for the Ministerial Code, adding: “I cannot see the Government being persuaded that a statutory basis for an inherently prerogative function would be appropriate or desirable.”
Fellow Labour peer John Tomlinson said the Government had “trashed” the ministerial code, and said that the government had to take their responsibilities seriously “as a solemn and binding duty to the British people”.
Menzies Campbell, former Liberal Democrat leader, joked that Mr Johnson had spoken “softly” in the debate in the Commons yesterday, as he was 400miles away in Northumbria on a hospital visit.
He also said there was not necessarily a need to change the ministerial code, but a need to get Boris Johnson to implement it.
Another Labour peer, Dianne Hayter, said she ‘felt’ for the minister in having to respond for the government, but asked Lord True if he was “at all ashamed” of his MP colleagues.
Lord True simply referred to what had been said by Steve Barclay MP in the Commons debate yesterday, where he acknowledged the government had made a mistake.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel