Some things in life just defy logic. Why do people listen to the insipid Ed Sheeran? Why are so many obsessed with the royals? Who actually watches Love Island? Baffling, I know. But the one enduring challenge to every vestige of rational thinking has to be Boris Johnson’s popularity.
The Owen Paterson saga, I hear you cry, has changed all this. Johnson; the slippery, self-interested, snake-like, shape-shifting, smirking, smarmy, slimy, shameless, shambling showman is finally in deep s***. At long last, the blundering buffoon is getting his comeuppance. The long hook is hovering from the wings and it’s just about to haul his second-rate clown show act off the stage.
Read more: A Scottish pub that doesn’t sell booze … I’ll drink to that
Or is it? His ability to ride roughshod through endless scandals is legendary. Bonking Boris – the proroguer of parliaments, the man who left his cancer-inflicted wife for a young sort in the office, the disgraced journalist fired for lies, the defender of bullying ministers, the diplomatic dunce whose staggering ineptitude helped extend a mother’s sentence in an Iranian jail – plays by his own rules. Liar, cheater, self-promoter, moral abyss, the list goes on and on.
It’s with some relief, here, that I have to point out the majority of Scots regard him as the faker he is. And as much as I like to think that people across the UK share similar beliefs in fairness, equality and justice, it’s the Boris “issue” that blows this out the water. Why do so many down there like him?
Now, I’m sure if I was an expert in psephology, psychology or even fairground acts I would be able to present some well-researched theory to explain this. Sure, he’s “redefined” what it is to be a politician, and in many ways his ascent has been driven by similar forces that propelled his pal Donald Trump to the top job. But allow me to offer my own, rather less empirically based explanation. There are two actually, both of which assume his supporters have pretty low moral expectations.
The first asks the question, would you have a drink with him? The answer for Boris voters is yes please, absolutely. What a night it would be. A few pints down the local, anecdotes aplenty, then a slap-up curry. A regular bloke, who doesn’t give two hoots in the woke-dominated, climate-fixated, woolly liberal lefty, virtual signalling mad world we live in. A night out with strait-laced Keir Starmer, by comparison, would be about as much fun as tea with the vicar.
Read more: The Rolling Stones: Brown Sugar: Mick and Keith are right to axe song
The second theory, closely linked to the first, argues that Johnson’s outrageous flaws are his greatest asset. So what if he tried to change the rules on parliamentary standards, ostensibly to protect a loyal friend, but in all actuality to cover his own back over free foreign holidays? You would do the same in his position, wouldn’t you?
Such duplicity, the idea goes, is so blatant that in a way it’s honest. I realise this sounds counter-intuitive, but no-one has trust in politics anymore, so why pretend otherwise. The sheen of the super-slick professional politician – a la Tony Blair – has long worn off after being exposed for the dirty con trick it always was. Boris may be a liar, but at least he’s an honest liar, not a hypocritical one.
Of course, there are the blindly loyal who will always vote Tory regardless, and view any misdemeanour through blue-tinted spectacles. But as Albert Einstein said: “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will get you anywhere.” He was right, who would have imagined we’d end up with a Prime Minister like Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel