The Conservatives have been accused of trying to run a 'kangaroo court' from Westminster after voting through plans to change disciplinary processes for MPs.
The Government backed down on the controversial plans, which were voted through last night, that would have seen a new committee set up to look at disciplinary processes for MPs.
It would have also have seen any possible sanctions against rule-breaking MP Owen Paterson scrapped.
Wendy Chamberlain, the Liberal Democrat MP for North East Fife and the party's chief whip, said the Tories actions were not consistent with their rhetoric about creating a "fair and robust" process and called for a debate on what had happened.
She said: "The consequences of yesterday's vote are clearly far-reaching.
"The Government's decision not just to meddle in an independent process but to whip Conservative members to get what they wanted is one of the worst overreaches of executive power that this House has seen in its history.
"It is shameful that this Government will not apply the same standards of scrutiny to those within its own party."
She said the "Government wants to silence us [MPs]" and added: " There must be standards which are fair and robust, and which are seen to be fair and robust, but the Government's shortsighted intervention to protect a colleague using a political process to overturn in two hours an independent investigation that took two years is the complete opposite of fair and robust."
A three-hour emergency debate on the standards system for MPs will take place on Monday, after Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle approved Ms Chamberlain's application.
Conservative MPs Sir Peter Bottomley and Tobias Ellwood stood up in support of the debate application when Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle asked if MPs were in favour of it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel