TERMINALLY ill patients in remote areas of Scotland who are seeking to end their lives could be assessed by doctors over videolink, a consultation on assisted dying has suggested.
Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur wants to introduce new legislation in Holyrood which would permit assisted dying for adults who are both terminally ill and mentally competent.
But the plans – the third attempt to pass such a law in Scotland – have sparked strong opposition from campaigners and some medical professionals.
A consultation on the proposed Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill suggests a range of safeguards, including requiring two doctors to confirm a person is terminally ill and mentally competent.
The person would also have to sign a written declaration of their request, which would be witnessed and signed by both doctors.
However, the consultation notes that "assisted dying may in practice be harder to obtain for people living in small and remote communities, including island communities – particularly as travelling is likely to be particularly difficult for people with a terminal illness".
It continues: "The process requires the direct involvement of a number of other people to carry out certain functions, for example the two independent doctor assessments at stage one.
"It may be harder for a person living in a small and remote community to identify individuals who are able to attend at the relevant time and place.
"It may also be more difficult for someone living in such a location to gain access to an alternative doctor if the only local doctor declines to assist on grounds of conscience.
"The member [Mr McArthur] acknowledges these difficulties and is keen to hear views on how this can be mitigated."
A footnote in the consultation document adds: "Research from permissive jurisdictions shows that assessments can be undertaken via videolink with the doctor and the patient in exceptional circumstances.
"Indeed, this has become more common practice for healthcare more generally since the Covid-19 pandemic forced us all into new ways of working."
Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, which highlighted the footnote, said the reference to a videolink consultation "beggars belief".
He added: "How can a medic make a decision on the state of mind of an individual on a remote internet connection without being in the physical presence of that person to try and make a measured judgement?"
He said many healthcare experts are "vehemently opposed to the Bill and are already expressing their views".
He added: “Legalising assisted suicide would put immeasurable pressure on vulnerable people including those with disabilities to end their lives prematurely, for fear of being a financial, emotional or care burden on others."
Mr McArthur said there is "strong public support for a change in the law to end the current blanket ban on assisted dying".
He said: "My proposals aim to deliver that change and give dying people who are suffering unbearably, more choice at the end of their life and the peace of mind that they do not need to suffer against their will.
"My proposals would require two doctors to outline alternative treatment and care options to someone seeking an assisted death.
"I also believe this needs to go hand in hand with significant further investment in palliative care, to both improve and widen access to such care.
"That is a case I will be vigorously making as the proposed bill goes through Parliament.
"However, it is increasingly clear that some terminally ill people find themselves beyond the reach of palliative care and wish to have the choice to die a dignified and compassionate death.
"No amount of scaremongering by some opponents of reform can change the fact that the status quo offers no real options, precious few safeguards and all too often only dreadful decisions.
"People in Scotland deserve better.”
On the prospect of online consultations, he said: "The proposals outlined in the bill consultation take into account the very real challenges of delivering aspects of healthcare in rural and remote communities.
"It is a very genuine consultation that seeks input on how to navigate these issues and provides information about how other jurisdictions operate in exceptional circumstances.
"There are ongoing wider conversations about how remote consultations might best be utilised in healthcare to reduce inequalities and barriers to access for individuals. We must ensure dying people are not left behind."
The consultation, which is open until December 22, says more than 200 million people currently live in jurisdictions which have legalised some form of assisted dying.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel