Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton has accused the First Minister of having “sacrificed the rights of children in Scotland” as part of a campaign of grievance politics in Westminster.
The Lib Dem said he was “outraged” that the Scottish Government had been advised legislation to incorporate the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) into Scots law was within Holyrood’s remit.
The UK Supreme Court ruled earlier this week that the Bill “breaches the limitations imposed on the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament by the Scotland Act”.
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill had been passed unanimously by MSPs at Holyrood earlier this year, but was later referred by the UK Government to the country’s highest court.
READ MORE: SNP accused of 'playing games with children's rights' after court defeat
Mr Cole-Hamilton, speaking to PA Scotland, said the Scottish Government had been “advised it was passing bad legislation” but had decided to press ahead with it “just for grievance with Westminster”.
Deputy First Minister John Swinney has already made clear that the Scottish Government “remains absolutely committed to the incorporation of the UNCRC into Scots law to the maximum extent possible”, with plans being put in place to revise the legislation.
But Mr Swinney also insisted that the unanimous ruling by the Supreme Court on Wednesday made “crystal clear” that “the devolution settlement does not give Scotland the powers it needs”.
The Deputy First Minister stated: “While we fully respect the court’s judgment, it lays bare the weakness of, and the limits in, the devolution settlement.”
Nicola Sturgeon
Mr Cole-Hamilton said: “I am outraged at the Scottish Government that it was advised it was passing bad legislation, didn’t tell the opposition. It knew it was going to end up in court and decided to pull the trigger on that just for grievance with Westminster.
“Nicola Sturgeon has sacrificed the rights of children in Scotland on the altar of grievance with Westminster.”
Mr Cole-Hamilton, who worked as a youth worker prior to becoming an MSP in 2016, also spent two years as the Convener of the Scottish Alliance for Children’s Rights, saying he had “probably done more on the UNCRC than any other member of the Scottish Parliament”.
And he said the Supreme Court verdict was “devastating” for those who have been campaigning to have the rights contained in that enshrined into Scots law.
READ MORE: Holyrood Supreme Court defeat: SNP has 'politicised' legal standoff 'from the start'
Speaking ahead of the Scottish Liberal Democrat autumn conference which starts on Friday, Mr Cole-Hamilton said: “Children have been waiting 30 years since we signed the UNCRC for it to be incorporated into Scots law and yet this becomes a skirmish in the wider frontier of independence. And that is just depressing, it is so depressing.”
He said the issues the Supreme Court had identified with the Bill were a “technicality” which the Scottish Parliament could “easily fix”.
But speaking about the legislation as a whole, he said: “I think it is of more value to the SNP as a tool of grievance than it is for children’s rights.”
The First Minister's spokesman was not impressed with the comments
A Spokesperson for the First Minister said: “Alex Cole Hamilton’s comments are as absurd as they are predictable.
“He and his party voted for this Bill, along with every member at Holyrood, and if he is as concerned about children’s rights as he claims to be then he should be taking issue with a UK Tory government which chose to try and block the legislation as passed.
“While we respect the ruling of the UK Supreme Court, all it has done is confirm the tight limits of devolution and underline the case for independence so that Scotland’s Parliament is free to legislate on important issues like children’s rights.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel