ONE of the most senior figures in the Orange Order in Northern Ireland has warned Nicola Sturgeon not to create a Scottish version of the Parades Commission.
Rev Mervyn Gibson, the Order’s Grand Secretary, said it would be "biased" against Protestants and only result in more “division” and “intolerance”.
He urged SNP ministers “not to dance to the tune of a small number of Roman Catholic protestors who don’t want a Protestant about the place”.
The First Minister said on Thursday that she was considering setting up a Northern-Ireland style commission following 14 arrests at Orange walks last weekend.
If followed James Dornan, the SNP MSP for Glasgow Cathcart, raising the issue at FMQs.
Noting reports of “disgraceful anti-Catholic singing during the Orange Order marches throughout Glasgow”, he said at least three had marched past Roman Catholic churches causing “great distress” to parishioners and others.
With other “shameful reports” of Glasgow City Councillors receiving death threats when they suggested restricting Orange Order parades, he asked Mr Sturgeon to consider “the creation of a parades commission, similar to that in Northern Ireland”.
He said this could “take a non-partisan and independent look at the number and routes of such parades", adding: "I am in no doubt that, just as in Northern Ireland, a parades commission would go a long way towards taking some of the heat out of the discussion of parades.”
Northern Ireland's Parades Commission was established in 1998 following violence and unrest associated with parades in the town of Portadown, known as the Drumcree conflict.
It is an independent public body with seven members and is responsible for placing restrictions on any parades.
Ms Sturgeon said there was “no place” for anti-Catholic bigotry in modern Scotland, and confirmed she would ask justice secretary Keith Brown to consider the idea.
But Rev Gibson told the Belfast News Letter a Scottish Commission would be biased and counterproductive, and using hate crime legislation would be fairer.
He said: “We think it would be a bad idea. It sustains division and here it used to reward the threat of violence.
“Parading by and large is a cultural activity of the Protestant community, thereby any body created to look at parades by extension has a bias against that community.
“Whereas hate crime legislation applies to all intolerance and bigotry, irrespective of race, creed or gender. We believe there’s enough laws to do with antisocial and hate crime.
“A parades commission only introduces another layer of unnecessary and unhelpful bureaucracy that encourages intolerance.”
He added: “A more useful response would be for the Scottish parliament to engage with people. I believe the largest party in Scotland, the SNP, has little or no contact with the Orange Institution.
“They may differ constitutionally but that shouldn’t stop dialogue on other matters.
“When I say dialogue – that’s talking, not lecturing, that’s discussing, not dictating.
“I would urge the Scottish Executive not to dance to the tune of a small number of Roman Catholic protestors who don’t want a Protestant about the place.”
Mr Dornan said: “The Reverend Gibson is old enough to have lived through the annual troubles over marches and the ‘division and intolerance’ on show during these years.
“Since the creation of the Parades Commission these disputes over marches appear to have almost disappeared.
"It’s my view that ‘division and intolerance’ can be got rid off if people accept the requirement for change and the need to leave their silos.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel