A CONSERVATIVES bid to unseat the SNP leader of Glasgow city council today with a motion of no confidence has fallen at the first hurdle.
The Glasgow Tory group released a statement suggesting a vote was to be taken on Susan Aitken's position today.
As the Glasgow Times reports, they accuse the council leader of having "completely failed to listen to concerns about the state of Glasgow's rubbish-strewn streets".
However, the move has fallen at the first hurdle, with Lord Provost Phil Braat ruling the motion incompetent.
Responding to the news, Glasgow Tories leader Thomas Kerr said: "Disappointed that Lord Provost has ruled this motion as 'not competent'.
"Susan Aitken and the SNP may hide behind procedural rulings to avoid scrutiny but the Glasgow Tories won't back down.
"Others may jurk from their responsibility to hold the Glasgow SNP accountable, we won't."
It is understood the motion was put in the form of a standing order, which does not provide for motions of no confidence, resulting in the Lord Provost's decision.
Ms Aitken was blasted by opposition politicians following an interview on STV, where she admitted Glasgow was in need of a "spruce up" ahead of COP26.
This afternoon @GlasgowTories will table a motion of No Confidence in the Leader of @GlasgowCC, Susan Aitken.
— Cllr Thomas Kerr (@CllrTKerr) September 9, 2021
Her refusal to answer basic question and accept Glasgow is in the grip of a waste crisis has left us no other option to table this motion.
Statement 👇 #CleanUpGlasgow pic.twitter.com/NRPonCnuhm
Asked directly if she agreed the streets were “filthy”, the SNP council leader replied: “I don’t think that everywhere in the city is filthy."
A statement released on social media by Conservative group councillors read: "Glasgow needs fresh leadership. That is why the Glasgow Conservatives believe it is the right time to table this no confidence motion, ahead of the eyes of the world being on our city as world leaders arrive for COP26.
"Most Glaswegians would be embarrassed at welcoming world leaders and other dignitaries, including the Queen and the Pope, to our city while it is so filthy."
Glasgow city council has repeatedly insisted have increased in real terms in recent years.
A council spokesman said: "The Lord Provost ruled that he would not accept a late material change to the motion.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel