PRESIDENT Joe Biden’s role in Afghanistan and his future after the Kabul airport attack dominated the newspaper comment sections.
The Daily Express
Paul Baldwin said Biden has blood on his hands.
“It’s the same thing of course but it’s the blood of the dead US Marines which will bring down his presidency,” he said. “Let’s be clear about why 95 people, including 13 US servicemen (at time of writing), are dead today: because Biden wanted an easy soundbite to spout on the anniversary of 9/11. In two weeks time he wanted to be able to say, “20 years after the attack on the Twin Towers there are no more American boots on the ground in Afghanistan. Mission accomplished.”
He said all he has done is make America look weak and foolish in the eyes of the world.
“The anniversary of 9/11 is not just a date Joe Biden will mark - it was also, lest we forget, the most successful attack on mainland USA in history. A high watermark for America’s enemies.
“Will those same American enemies just quietly let it pass you think Joe?”
The Guardian
Ben Davis thinks Biden’s approval ratings will bounce back because most Americans support the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
“Biden has hit a crisis that looks like it could sink his presidency, but he is right to dismiss his critics and stay the course, both morally and politically,” he said. “While the spasm of negative coverage has damaged his approval rating temporarily, the underlying policy of withdrawing from Afghanistan is extremely popular.”
He said there was no credible alternative but to withdraw.
“Biden could certainly have airlifted American civilians and Afghan refugees sooner – it’s clear that a Taliban takeover could not have been avoided. Despite the chaos at the airport, about 100,000 Afghans have been evacuated in a very short period of time. If two decades of war to the tune of $1tn couldn’t stop a Taliban takeover, then the only responsible decision is to avoid yet more war and loss of life.”
The Times
The leader column said the airport atrocity only underlined the scale of the western defeat and the bedraggled and avoidable debacle of the withdrawal.
“The immediate consequence of the attack will be to heap further political pressure on Joe Biden,” it said. “The US president’s judgment is already under fire for ordering this precipitate withdrawal to meet his own artificial deadline, against the advice of his military and without consulting allies.
“The reality is that Mr Biden has few good options. If he were to halt the evacuation, he would risk leaving many vulnerable Afghans including some who may have helped western forces, to their fate. That leaves him with little choice but to continue the mission until all those eligible for evacuation have been rescued despite the heightened danger. Either way, the American retreat is now dependent on security cover from the Taliban that is plainly inadequate.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here