A TORY MP has been urged to correct the official parliamentary record after wrongly claiming Glasgow is the only Scottish council to take part in the Syrian resettlement scheme.
Jack Brereton interrupted Ian Blackford, the SNP Westminster leader, during his speech in the Commons today to ask why his party were not sticking to their ‘rhetoric’ and urging more councils in Scotland to accept refugees.
Mr Brereton, MP for Stoke-on-Trent, said: “Given that only Glasgow has been the only city, and only authority in Scotland to be part of the resettlement scheme until now, will the SNP actually stick to their rhetoric and start putting forward other authority areas to be part of the resettlement scheme?”
However several Scottish MPs began berating Mr Brereton immediately, saying his claims were false.
Mr Blackford responded: “My goodness, I don't think the gentleman's actually be listening to anything we've been saying over the course of the last few days.
“The Scottish government stands ready to work with the UK Government…
“Let me tell the government benches that I want to make sure that every local authority in Scotland has the opportunity to take refugees from Afghanistan. And that is precisely the position of the government in Scotland, but it has to come with the government in London and the devolved administration's working together, there has to be a summit of the four nations to discuss exactly how.”
Alan Brown, MP for Kilmarnock, later said the Tory's claims were "rubbish".
He said: “To correct the record, my local authority of east Ayrshire council has got Syrian refugees, [Brendan O’Hara MP] next to me is saying so does Argyll and Bute, and we know Dundee has, so that is utter nonsense from [Mr Brereton].”
Brendan O’Hara then shouted at the MP to “correct the record”.
Mr Blackford said: “I also know in my own area in Highland that we have refugees from Syria as well, and indeed they were most welcomed by the community.”
While the announcement of a UK resettlement scheme for Afghan refugees is welcome in principle, the commitment to 20,000 in ‘long term’ and just 5000 this year is woefully inadequate. I call on UK Gov to go further to meet its responsibilities. @scotgov ready to play full part
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) August 18, 2021
The MP for Ross, Skye and Lochaber added later that the UK Government should be planning for more than double the 20,000 refugees they have so far announced as expected to come to the UK.
He said the Afghan resettlement scheme “should have a minimum commitment of welcoming at least, 35,000 to 40,000 Afghan refugees in the UK, in line with the population share welcomed from Syria.
“3000 of these Syrian refugees have now made Scotland their new home. They have contributed to our economy and to our communities. They are Syrians, and they are now part of Scotland’s story. “They are our friends. They are our neighbours. It is only right that we can offer the same warmth and welcome to Afghan refugees facing the same dangerous and desperate situation.”
Glasgow councillor Jen Layden later said Mr Brereton’s claims were concerning.
All councils in Scotland have taken part in the Syrian Refugee Scheme. Glasgow is the only Scottish Local Authority that is an asylum dispersal area. Concerning that members of the UK government don’t know the difference https://t.co/u47Vl7fJxv
— Cllr Jen Layden (@JenLaydenSNP) August 18, 2021
She tweeted: “All councils in Scotland have taken part in the Syrian Refugee Scheme. Glasgow is the only Scottish Local Authority that is an asylum dispersal area. Concerning that members of the UK government don’t know the difference.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel