DOWNING Street has defended the president of COP26 despite revelations that he travelled to 30 countries in the space of seven months.
Alok Sharma is reported to have flown to several ‘red-list’ countries and not had to self-isolate on return as he has ‘crown servant’ status.
Critics have said the trips show “hypocrisy” on the part of the UK Government, not only due to the lack of quarantine but the impact on the climate of the level of travel Mr Sharma has taken.
Although not all the flights have been returns directly to the UK, Mr Sharma is still estimated to have clocked up thousands of air miles during the trips.
No.10 defended Mr Sharma’s jet-setting, with a spokesman saying he was “leading climate negotiations with countries including major emitters to cut emissions and secure ambitious action ahead of the Cop26 summit.”
He added: “The majority of this work is done remotely but some travel to key countries for face-to-face talks is essential.
“He has secured ambitious action as a result of the discussions he has had. For example, immediately following his visit to Japan and South Korea the governments there committed to ambitious net zero targets, which was a key ask from the UK.”
Mr Sharma is currently on a visit to red-list countries Bolivia and Brazil but is expected not to have to quarantine on his return due to his special status as a crown servant.
The spokesman added: “Ministers conducting essential travel such as this are exempted from quarantine, as set out in the rules.”
Asked if he would quarantine on his return from Brazil, the spokesman said: “He will continue to comply with the rules as set out.”
Alan Brown MP, the SNP’s climate change spokesman, said Mr Sharma should be “setting an example, not exploiting a loophole and flying without a care in the middle of a pandemic and to countries on the red list.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here