NICOLA Sturgeon has been accused of a "Trump-style meltdown" amid a row over whether a key vaccination target was met.
The Scottish Conservatives hit out after the First Minister suggested her critics on the issue lacked intelligence and common sense.
Ms Sturgeon previously told MSPs that "by July 26, we expect to have given second doses to all 40- to 49-year-olds".
However, figures show just 75.8 per cent of people in this age group had been given both doses as of Sunday.
By yesterday, this had risen to 77.4%, while 90.7% had been given their first dose.
Ms Sturgeon said all adults had been offered a coronavirus vaccine, in line with targets, but that it was voluntary and so she could not guarantee 100% uptake.
Speaking during a Scottish Government coronavirus briefing, she said: "When I communicate, and I apologise if this is an error, I kind of communicate at a level where I assume a certain level of intelligence on the part of people listening to me, because I think that's justified.
"And I assume a certain ability to attach context and common sense to what I am saying.
"Now I'll go from there to taking what over the last couple of days has appeared to be an interpretation by opposition politicians and by some journalists that when I said what you just read out there, what I actually meant was that I was giving a guarantee that by a certain date 100% of people would not just have been offered the vaccine, but would have had the vaccine.
"Now all I would say is if that is genuinely what people – journalists, opposition politicians – thought I meant, and that I had committed to that without compulsory vaccination, I'm genuinely really surprised that there wasn't a clamour of questions – in fact I don't think there was a single one – asking me how on earth I was going to deliver that commitment.
"How could I, without saying vaccination would be compulsory for every person with no exception...how could I possibly have guaranteed 100% uptake of a voluntary vaccination programme?
"Maybe I need to not make the mistake of assuming a level of ability to put context and common sense around how I communicate things.
"Everybody, with any thought attached to it, would have known – not least because it's what all goverments across the UK are doing – that what I was committing to, which is what we have delivered, is making sure 100% had been offered an appointment for a vaccine."
She said uptake levels are already "extraordinarily high", and apologised if she sounded "irritated".
Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Annie Wells said: “Question after question at Tuesday’s Covid briefing got the full Nicola Sturgeon condescending eye-roll treatment.
"In a Trump-style meltdown for the ages, the First Minister claimed she was communicating at a more intelligent, higher level than the rest of us.
"This kind of hostile performance treats the public like fools.
"Her defence for missing a key vaccine target seems to be that nobody understands Nicola except Nicola.
"People hoping for answers to serious questions instead got a truly bizarre rant. She talked down to us mere mortals because we had the audacity to believe she had meant what she said in the Scottish Parliament.
"Nicola Sturgeon seems to have forgotten that it was her Health Secretary, Humza Yousaf, who was pulled up for using inaccurate statistics about children with Covid.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel