A MINISTER has been slapped down by Number 10 after suggesting it was "up to individuals" to decide whether to self-isolate after being "pinged" as a contact by the NHS Covid-19 app.
Downing Street said it was "crucial" for people to quarantine in line with the app's recommendation, just hours after business minister Paul Scully suggested people should make an "informed decision" about whether to obey the technology.
He said self-isolating after being told to by the app was a decision for individuals and employers.
Another minister in the business department, Lord Grimstone of Boscobel, stressed in a letter to one large employer that the app was only an "advisory tool" and that people were not under any "legal duty", The Times reported.
Although it has never been a legal requirement to obey the app's instructions, the official NHS guidance has been that people should "self-isolate immediately" when told to.
A No 10 spokeswoman said: "Isolation remains the most important action people can take to stop the spread of the virus.
"Given the risk of having and spreading the virus when people have been in contact with someone with Covid, it is crucial people isolate when they are told to do so, either by NHS Test and Trace or by the NHS Covid app.
"Businesses should be supporting employees to isolate, they should not be encouraging them to break isolation."
Earlier, Mr Scully told Times Radio: "It's important to understand the rules. You have to legally isolate if you are on the... contacted by Test and Trace, or if you're trying to claim isolation payments.
"The app is there to give... to allow you to make informed decisions. And I think by backing out of mandating a lot of things, we're encouraging people to really get the data in their own hands to be able to make decisions on what's best for them, whether they're employer or an employee."
Asked whether this meant people should or should not self-isolate if "pinged", he said: "We want to encourage people to still use the app to be able to do the right thing, because we estimate it saves around 8,000 lives."
However, he added that it was "up to individuals and employers".
On Monday night, Boris Johnson had stressed the importance of self-isolation as "one of the only shots we have got left in our locker to stop the chain reaction of the spread of Covid" following the lifting of England's restrictions.
Professor Sir Jonathan Montgomery, who chaired the ethics advisory board for NHSX on its contact tracing app, told Times Radio the Government needed to give clearer guidance to people about what to do when told to self-isolate.
"When we had no protection the risk was the same for everybody. If that risk is now reduced because someone is double-vaccinated, it feels as though we need more sophisticated advice," Sir Jonathan said.
"If we are visiting an elderly relative or a cancer patient then take the ping seriously, but if you are doing something relatively Covid-friendly, then maybe make a different decision."
Labour hadow health minister Justin Madders said: "The Government is making it up as they go along.
"Ministers mix messages, change approach and water down proposals when the public and businesses need clarity and certainty."
It comes after Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Chancellor Rishi Sunak were forced to U-turn over self-isolation at the weekend.
No 10 initially said they would not have to isolate after coming into contact with Health Secretary Sajid Javid, who had tested positive for coronavirus, as they were taking part in a pilot scheme involving daily testing instead.
However this decision was reversed following widespread outrage, with opposition politicians claiming it was "one rule for them and another for the rest of us".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here