An SNP MP has accused Boris Johnson of 'fuelling racism' and said UK Ministers had "encouraged" a false narrative on the issue.
At Business questions in the Commons, Anum Qaisar-Javed, MP for Airdrie and Shotts, read out online racist abuse she had received she had experienced as she called for “real action”.
Ms Qaisar-Javed said: “On social media I’ve been told that I shouldn’t be involved in politics because I’m not a Brit, I’m a Paki. That is, of course, wrong on both accounts. I’m neither a Brit nor a Paki, I’m a proud Scot.
“On social media, I’ve also been told to f*** off home. That, of course, doesn’t make sense. I was born in Edinburgh, Scotland is my home. I’m not unique, however, in any sense, and we saw this with the horrific racial abuse that black England players received on social media.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson accused of giving racism 'the green light'
“Every day people are racially abused online because of a false narrative built upon prejudice and assumptions. One that ministers in this Government have encouraged, I’m afraid to say."
In the Chamber I raised my own experiences of racism online - called “Paki” + told “fuck off home”.
— Anum Qaisar-Javed MP (@AnumQaisarJaved) July 15, 2021
Instead of committing to an urgent debate on racism online next week, Jacob Rees Mogg accused me of being party political.
I spoke the truth, Boris Johnson has fuelled racism.
She added: “Yesterday the Prime Minister admitted that there’s a systematic issue of racism particularly on social media. The House may be united against racism but we need to see real action. What does the Government intend to do about this?
“There was an urgent question yesterday – will the leader of the House make time for an urgent debate next week in this chamber (so) MPs of colour can also raise their contributions?”
Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg branded the abuse “appalling”, urging the perpetrators to “crawl back under the rock from which they came”.
But he added: “I’m sorry that (she) wishes to make this party political because I really think it isn’t.”
Ms Qaisar-Javed later went further with her criticism of the UK Government, and Mr Rees-Mogg's response, tweeting: "In the Chamber I raised my own experiences of racism online.
"Instead of committing to an urgent debate on racism online next week, Jacob Rees Mogg accused me of being party political. I spoke the truth, Boris Johnson has fuelled racism."
During the debate, Mr Rees-Mogg had said: “May I begin by saying how appalling it is that (she) has been treated in that way and anyone who has sent her a message of that kind should – to use the Prime Minister’s words – crawl back under the rock from which they came.
“They are not people who should behave in this way and there is one fundamental thing that we should all know, that in this country there is a fundamental equality in every respect of every single British citizen, whether it is somebody who has received a British passport a minute ago, or who has been descended from people who were Picts.”
READ MORE: England players' racist abuse a 'wake-up' call for Tory Government
Mr Rees-Mogg branded social media a “sewer that is in need of cleansing”.
He added: “I’m sorry that (she) wishes to make this party political because I really think it isn’t.
“I think… the whole House is outraged by the way that she has been treated and there is action being taken, as the Prime Minister set out yesterday. He had discussions with the social media companies to remind them of their responsibilities and of what will happen under the Online Safety Bill if they do not live up to their responsibilities.
“Social media is regrettably a sewer and some of the most disgusting bits of life get washed through it, but it is a sewer that is in need of cleansing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel