WENDY Alexander confidently predicted a new Scottish Parliament building would be cheaper than refurbishing the Old Royal High School on Calton Hill.
While a special adviser to Scottish Secretary Donald Dewar in 1997, Alexander, who later briefly led Scottish Labour, listed multiple objections to converting the iconic A-listed site.
In a July 1997 memo to Tony Blair’s Scottish political adviser Pat McFadden, she said Scotland needed “a parliament for the 21st century”, whereas the ORHS was cramped, unsuitable for IT, hard to police, and “the layout of the debating chamber itself is likely to encourage a confrontational style”.
READ MORE FROM THE RELEASED NATIONAL ARCHIVES:
Secret UK email says Holyrood can hold its own independence referendum
Tony Blair against Scottish Parliament having income tax powers
Sean Connery feared tax bill if he campaigned in devolution vote
She wrote: “It is clear that substantial sums - in the region of £20-£25m - possibly more - would have to be spent converting and refurbishing the building.
“As with any old building, there is a risk that these costs may rise after building work begins. Whatever the conversion costs, the Old Royal High School will be more expensive to run and maintain that a modern building.”
McFadden said the Scottish office would have to be careful "it is not seen to cost too much”.
The new Holyrood building was four years late and ten times over budget at £414m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel