TRADE unions face a looming dilemma over whether to support workers who refuse Covid jags and so clash with their employers and colleagues, a leading public health expert has warned.
Andrew Watterson, professor of occupational and environmental health at Stirling University, said unions had so far been urging vaccination take-up, and for making key workers a priority.
But as lockdown restrictions ease and working from home ceases to be the norm, the same unions now have to consider how to handle members who refuse vaccine.
In a paper published in today’s Scottish Left Review, Prof Watterson was also critical of how the vaccination programme had been rolled out in Scotland and the rest of the UK to key workers.
He writes “Serious fault lines in UK and Scottish-specific health and workplace policy making and evidence gathering were exposed.”
He goes on: “Dilemmas exist for unions too. Unions argued for collective action to press government, employers, and regulators to raise and apply the best possible Covid health and safety standards available.
“Assuming vaccine delivery and vaccine hesitancy problems have been addressed sensitively, unions are now faced with new problems - in the form of workers choosing to refuse vaccination.
“Employers may well decide that if such workers refuse vaccination and cannot be redeployed to other work, then dismissal will result.
“This is a matter for employment tribunals and the courts to resolve.
“If employers do not move or dismiss ‘refusers’, will unions then argue on health and safety grounds that refusers put other employees and the public at risk and so will not work with them?
“Additionally, if ‘equitable’ vaccine passports are introduced, will unions argue those who choose not to get vaccinations and hence lack passports, as distinct from those unable to get vaccinations who lack such passports, should not be admitted to clubs, pubs, shops etc where they may put employees at risk of contracting Covid?”
Dave Moxham, deputy general secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress, agreed unions faced a “challenge”, and would try to limit “flashpoints” through talks between employers and employees.
He said: “We would generally be advising members wherever possible to vaccinate because that’s part of the public health message.
“But where people do have incredibly strong views or particular fears in terms of a vaccination, we would, on an individual basis, be recommending that unions try and negotiate with employers on adjustments to work patterns in order to accommodate that.
“We certainly wouldn’t be in favour of people being dismissed on the basis of that. But we recognise it is a meaningful challenge.
"We are strongly in favour of mass vaccination, but recognise the rights of individual employees to do otherwise."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel