Boris Johnson told Dominic Cummings in 2016 that it would be “ludicrous” for him to become Prime Minister, according to the former adviser’s latest blog post.
The Prime Minister’s former chief aide has been using his Substack website to launch a series of attacks on the way the Government operates.
Mr Cummings claimed in a blog post on Monday that he knew that Mr Johnson was “unfit to be PM”, adding: “We also knew that he knew too, since he’d told us.”
Mr Cummings wrote: “On 24 June 2016 in Vote Leave HQ, just after Cameron had resigned, Boris pulled me into the odd little room where the ‘campaign within the campaign’ was run. What now?
“Boris told me with a laugh, ‘Obviously it’s ludicrous me being PM — but no more ludicrous than Dave or George, don’t you think?’
“I agreed and reminded him of the main elements of the deal we’d agreed with (Michael) Gove about what to do next.”
The former adviser left Number 10 in November following a bitter power struggle.
In recent months Cummings has frequently used his blog and Twitter account to criticise the Government he helped into power, reveal damaging information about Johnson and attack former health secretary Matt Hancock.
The former adviser shared WhatsApp messages from Johnson branding Hancock “totally f****** hopeless” in the early days of the pandemic. Weeks later Hancock resigned after leaked CCTV footage showed him kissing departmental aide Gina Coladangelo.
Following Hancock’s resignation last week Cummings claimed Johnson – who initially said he considered the kissing matter closed – only let Hancock go due to being bombarded with text messages from his wife Carrie.
Cummings claimed “89 Carrie texts p/hour” influenced Johnson’s U-turn.
When Hancock’s replacement Sajid Javid was announced, Cummings decided to again stir the pot – saying he “tricked” Johnson into firing the former chancellor into firing him last year and calling the appointment “awful” for the NHS.
He alleged that Javid’s promotion, too, was influenced by Carrie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel