IAN Blackford enjoys being part of the “Westminster furniture” too much to risk it on a second independence referendum, Michael Gove has claimed.
The Cabinet Office minister said the SNP Westminster leader was “a lovely chap and a good friend” but in no hurry for a vote that could upend his political career.
Mr Blackford said he wanted Indyref2 “in a timely manner” but refused to put a date on it, despite Nicola Sturgeon saying it should be by the end of 2023.
In an interview with the Telegraph, Mr Gove dismissed Mr Blackford’s assertion that it was only a matter of time before Boris Johnson conceded Indyref2.
Asked if he could imagine any circumstance in which the Prime Minister would do so before the next scheduled general election in 2024, Mr Gove said: “I don’t think so.
“Ian’s a lovely chap and a good friend. Ian enjoys being in Westminster so much, I suspect that he probably wouldn’t want a referendum any time soon either.
“I mean, you know, he’s a lovely part of the Westminster furniture. But more broadly, no.”
READ MORE: SNP refuse to identify Indyref2 funds in accounts despite cash row
The comment is an attempt to stoke division in the Yes movement, where the SNP is already faces criticism from Alex Salmond’s Alba party about letting independence “go cold”.
Also talking to the Telegraph for a documentary on Scottish independence, Mr Blackford was asked when he would like to hold Indyref2.
He said: “The message that we’ve got from the people, I think in general is that people understand that there will be a referendum. There is a majority in parliament for that.
“But there’s also a message that people expect us to deal with the pandemic first, so let’s do that. And from a position of safety, as we’re discussing economic recovery.. If we’re to deliver the economic recovery we want to see, then the parliament has to have the powers to deliver that. So in a timely manner. I don’t want to put a date on it.
“I understand why, for a lot of people, that discussion on timing is important. I get that.
“I think he [Mr Johnson] recognises that he can’t deny democracy. The SNP have won this [Holyrood] election in Scotland with 48 per cent of the vote.
“It’s not a good look for Boris Johnson to say, ‘That’s not good enough’.
“Of course it’s a mandate, and he recognises that he’s going to have to come to the table and give that authority to the Scottish Parliament to call the referendum. It will happen.”
READ MORE: Westminster snubs SNP plea to extend EU residency scheme
If the SNP secured a Yes vote in another referendum, its MPs, including Mr Blackford, would no longer be at Westminster, while if it lost, it could lead to the party fracturing in the wake of a second defeat.
Nicola Sturgeon has said she wants Indyref2 by late 2023, Covid permitting, and independence in 2026 if there is a Yes vote.
However Mr Johnson has refused to grant Holyrood the powers for a legally watertight vote.
Ms Sturgeon has threatened to put referendum legislation through Holyrood regardless if he continues to refuse, raising the prospect of a battle at the UK Supreme Court to see if Holyrood does have the power to hodl such a referendum without Westminster consent.
The Union is reserved to Westminster under the 1998 Scotland Act, but some legal academic argue Holyrood could still test public opinion on whether to end it.
Mr Blackford said of that possibility, “let’s see what happens”, but said he would prefer the issue did nott end up in court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel