WEDDING industry workers have staged a protest against the current coronavirus restrictions with uncertainty lingering on ceremonies taking place amid changes of the levels.
Pauline Borris, of LBS Event Design & Wedding Planners, organised the protest on Monday outside the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh citing a lack of clarity in the rules.
A few dozen people attended wearing T-shirts and holding banners saying “No sir, we can’t boogie” in a swipe at the Euro 2020 fan zone being held in Glasgow Green for thousands of attendees.
Ms Borris revealed some couples are putting off their nuptials by two years to 2023 due to the guidance which currently only allows up to 200 people to attend.
No more than 200 people should attend a wedding in Level 0, according to the Scottish Government, with the figure at 100 for Level 1, 50 for Levels 2 and 3, and 20 for those in Level 4.
READ MORE: Donald MacLeod: Governments are divorced from reality over wedding industry
Most of Scotland’s islands are in Level 0, with much of central Scotland in Level 2 and other areas in Level 1.
Ms Borris told the PA news agency: “We got on really well today, we hope we’ve got the message across, we just need to wait and see what Nicola announces tomorrow.
“The main aim is for us to be treated equally with the rest of the events industry and for clarity when you can have the fan zone happen in Glasgow Green for 6,000 people non-tested – but you can’t have weddings.
“Couples are now moving their weddings to 2022/23 and we just don’t know where we stand with bookings because we don’t know what’s going to happen – couples don’t want to get married when they can’t dance or can’t move from their tables.”
READ MORE: Andy Burnham says some Manchester residents 'seriously out of pocket' over travel ban
The current guidance states weddings “should only take place in a safe environment” and “face-to-face interaction within two metres should be avoided as far as possible”.
It also recognises a marriage ceremony as a public event meaning that even in Levels 0, 1 and 2 there should be physical distancing – despite being able to hug friends and family in a social gathering at a private home.
Ms Borris has also had political backing on the calls for clarity with Labour MSP, Paul Sweeney, among those demanding answers in the Scottish Parliament.
She said: “We’ve got constant contact with politicians, my local MSP Paul Sweeney brought it up in Parliament last week about the inconsistency with events… John Swinney’s response was basically, ‘we need to go down the levels’.
“Even when we go down the levels in Level 0 we still don’t have any answers because you still can’t dance.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon suggests Andy Burnham playing politics over travel ban row
“Some places in Scotland just now are in Level 0 and the only difference to Level 3 is basically you can have 100 at your wedding or 200, but still have the same restrictions are in place.
“Lives matter at the end of the day, that’s the most important thing, but most people that attend a wedding are older people who are probably in the vaccine stage and anyone who’s not had a vaccine, why could they not get a test?”
Mr Sweeney also told PA: “Pauline’s work to raise the plight of her business and the wider wedding industry has moved me.
“It is completely unacceptable for the Government to continue denying financial support to these businesses, while further restrictions ruin this year’s wedding season.
“To compound matters, big corporate interests have been free to set up huge events for Euro 2020 in Glasgow.
READ MORE: Ryanair to launch 'legal action' against government's 'traffic light' system
“We have also seen dancing permitted for exercise purposes, but not for weddings, so you can have a ceilidh as part of a club, but not at your wedding.
“The regulations are becoming nonsensical and undermining the credibility of public health advice from the Government.
“The double standard is obvious to most people and it is appalling. We urgently need a sanity check on the whole situation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel