POLLING expert John Curtice has outlined how allowing Scots living in the rest of the UK the right to vote in an independence referendum could impact the result.
According to reports, UK Government Cabinet ministers are putting pressure on Boris Johnson to allow Scots living anywhere in the UK to vote in a re-run of the 2014 independence referendum in a bid to firm up the fight to protect the Union.
The Prime Minister is also being urged to recruit former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson, to a newly created role of constitutional secretary, The Times reports.
- READ JOHN CURTICE'S FULL ANALYSIS:
John Curtice explains 'undoubted' impact of giving Scots across UK IndyRef vote
Ms Davidson, who is taking up a place in the House of Lords after quitting Holyrood, would head the pro-Union campaign from inside the UK Government, under the plans.
In the 2014 referendum, those registered to vote in Scotland took part in the independence referendum.
Writing exclusively in The Herald, John Curtice, a professor of politics at Strathclyde University claims the move to expand the franchise would “undoubtedly” help a comfortable unionist victory.
But what figures make up his theory?
- As explained by John Curtice, around 2% of those living in England & Wales and another 1% in Northern Ireland were born in Scotland. That is enough to add some 900,000 names to the referendum. Alongside the four million people who are eligible to vote in Scotland, they would represent nearly one in five of all those entitled to vote.
- In May/June 2014, the British Election study – which undertakes surveys of 30,000 people at a time - asked voters across the UK how they would cast their response to an Indyref. It showed that, from 381 people born in Scotland but living in England or Wales, 78% said they would vote No. Only 22% indicated they would back Yes.
- The same survey showed in 57% of voters in Scotland were backing No, 43% Yes – showing a twenty-point difference between the level of support in independence among those in Scotland, and Scots-born living elsewhere.
- Professor Curtice added that, if we chose an “optimistic assumption” that those Scots living in the UK would be just as likely to vote as those in Scotland, a prediction can be made moving forward. With polls currently having Yes just slightly below No, it would “undoubtedly” help solidify a No vote, he claimed.
- He added that if independence support would return to last summer’s peaks of 54%, rest of the UK votes might not be enough to delivery victory for the Union – Yes could still win 50.4%, he said.
- READ JOHN CURTICE'S FULL ANALYSIS:
John Curtice explains 'undoubted' impact of giving Scots across UK IndyRef vote
‘Rigging the rules’?
The First Minister has criticised the tactics on changing the franchise and suggested the appeal to Mr Johnson is an admission a second vote on independence will take place.
Writing on Twitter, Ms Sturgeon said: “I see the anti independence campaign is trying to rig the rules of #indyref2 again (tho in doing so they also concede that it’s going to happen).
“Maybe they should just argue their case on its merits and allow everyone who lives in Scotland to decide.”
A UK Government cabinet minister told The Times that “we know Sturgeon will start trying to force another referendum as soon as she thinks it is politically tenable again”, warning “there are things we can and should do now to be ready for her”.
They added: “One thing is to open up eligibility of the vote to all Scots in the UK, not just those living in Scotland. The other is to bring Ruth back into the front line. She is the best pro-Union voice we have.”
I see the anti independence campaign is trying to rig the rules of #indyref2 again (tho in doing so they also concede that it’s going to happen).
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) June 21, 2021
Maybe they should just argue their case on its merits and allow everyone who lives in Scotland to decide #democracy https://t.co/Ymdu3yztY9
Another senior Tory figure told the paper: “Independence is behind in the polls now, and Sturgeon is getting flak from her own side for not talking about it since the election.
"We need to get out there on the front foot and start acting like we’re ahead and not just wait for her to catch up again, which was the catastrophic mistake we made after the 2014 referendum.”
A UK government spokeswoman said: "The sole priority of the UK Government is on continuing to roll out the UK’s life-saving vaccine programme and recovering from this health and economic emergency.
"It is our duty and our responsibility to focus entirely on Covid recovery. That is what people in Scotland, rightly, expect."
- READ JOHN CURTICE'S FULL ANALYSIS:
John Curtice explains 'undoubted' impact of giving Scots across UK IndyRef vote
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel