Schools have been warned to "tread carefully" during the alternative assessment process as fears grow that many pupils will face intensive, exam-style tests after Easter.
Parent representatives said families had been led to believe final results would be based on "efforts during the course of the year".
But there are concerns a significant number of young people will be assessed in high stress conditions with reduced preparation time.
One teacher has branded the approach "cruel", although senior staff representatives insisted it had been designed so schools could make arrangements according to their circumstances.
It comes after National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher exams were cancelled due to the impact of Covid-19.
READ MORE: Alternative assessment - Teachers face rush to submit grades
Grades will instead be based on teacher judgement supported by evidence, with the deadline for submission of provisional results falling on June 25.
A spokeswoman for parents’ organisation Connect said: “We are very concerned about suggestions that our young people are going to face lots of tests, prelims and exam-type arrangements.
“We were all led to believe that assessments under the alternative certification process would be based on evidence that is gathered work. It was not clear at any point that this would be an exam-like assessment operation.
“Many parents and young people have been led to believe that efforts during the course of the year would be what was taken into account.
“The fact that there are different systems of assessment everywhere is concerning too… Schools need to tread so carefully and cautiously with this.”
The spokeswoman said wellbeing and safety would be of “paramount” importance.
“Schools really need to check in with young people,” she added.
“We are very much in a world of children’s rights in Scotland and the exam-based qualifications system is very much being scrutinised. And, whilst these are difficult times for schools as they gather evidence, are tests, mocks and prelims really the best way to go?
“Many may have thought there would be a portfolio-based approach. Pupils have not had experience of exam-like conditions – is it right that this happens now? We are not in normal times and defaulting to normal processes does not seem the right way to go for all young people.”
READ MORE: SQA at centre of fresh row over pupil appeals
But Jim Thewliss, General Secretary at School Leaders Scotland, which represents secondary headteachers and other senior staff, said the process was aimed at enabling flexibility.
“Our view is that the evidence on which to base a grade must be robust and demonstrated evidence and it must be evidence which is consistent with the standards that the SQA has set out,” he added.
“In gathering evidence, the guidance to teachers has been to do this in the way which best suits the circumstances which the school and the young people find themselves in.
“One school might decide that the best way to do this is over a period of time and give pupils chunks of assessment over that extended period. Another school might say, ‘we are confident in the way young people have been learning during lockdown and we are confident that the best way of gathering the evidence that we need to decide on grades is through an exam-type situation’.
“There is a variety of approaches across the country. It may be that there are schools which had evidence banked before the second lockdown period at the turn of the year and those schools might decide to gather the remainder of the evidence throughout April and May.
"It’s all in the interests of gathering the best evidence in the most effective way – consistent with the standards.”
READ MORE: Headteachers brand proposals a 'non-starter'
Mr Thewliss stressed that the alternative assessment model had been “co-produced” by the National Qualifications 21 Group, whose members include the EIS teaching union and the National Parent Forum of Scotland.
“Where we are with this is that we are trying to find the best solution to an insoluble problem,” he said.
“We have a system that is in large part predicated on the expectation that there will be an exam to assess pupil learning at the end of the school year. That has been removed.
“What we have put in place is, we believe, the best possible system for ensuring young people can gain qualifications which are an accurate and accredited reflection of their ability.”
READ MORE: Scottish school to offer International Baccalaureate
An SQA spokesman said: “The [National Qualifications] Group has been clear that there is no requirement to replicate a full formal exam or prelim diet this year.
“SQA has provided a flexible and consistent framework for schools and colleges this year, including detailed guidance, material and support, based on assessment standards that teachers and lecturers are familiar with. We have also reduced the amount of evidence required, given the disruption to learning. The quality of evidence is important, rather than quantity, to ensure confidence in our qualifications system.
“Schools and colleges know their learners best, so it is appropriate that they deliver assessments which suit their circumstances, in discussion with parents, carers and learners. Local and national quality assurance of the evidence will help deliver fairness to learners.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel