WHEREVER has that nice new Nicola Sturgeon gone?
You know, the one who wore a heart as big as a Saltire on her sleeve at the Alex Salmond inquiry, the one whose only sin was to care too much for an old chum in distress (sniff).
The one we got at FMQs wasn’t Holyrood’s Oprah any more.
The queen of empathy was out, swiftly replaced by the Nicola Sturgeon of old, the First Bulldozer, crusher of Tories.
The one with rage in her veins and Ref2 Indy on her knuckles.
This Ms Sturgeon was also inordinately proud of her evidence the day before to the Salmond inquiry, using it brush off pesky questions from Ruth Davidson.
Like why the Government hadn’t conceded its doomed legal fight with the former FM sooner and saved taxpayers a bundle.
Clearly Ms Davidson hadn’t been paying attention to the “lengthy proceedings yesterday”, Ms Sturgeon tutted.
“I answered questions on this for eight hours. I will get on with leading the country through and out of a pandemic. I will leave Ruth Davidson and the Conservatives to play the political games that they seem to prioritise over everything else.”
Or why the Government failed to disclose documents to its own lawyers which just happened to be the ones that sank its case.
“I say again that I gave eight hours of evidence,” Ms Sturgeon repeated, as if to a child.
“The case ultimately collapsed because information came to light,” she added, explaining zilch.
Getting miffed, Ms Sturgeon said she wanted to “strike a note of consensus”, then promptly struck Ms Davidson in the ballots.
"By the time I sit down after this session, I will have been subjected to 10 hours of parliamentary scrutiny this week."
That's right. Ten whole hours, you disgusting weaklings.
"In a few weeks, I will also subject myself to the ultimate scrutiny: the scrutiny and the verdict of the people of Scotland. As I do so, Ruth Davidson will be slinking off to the House of Lords."
Baroness Getaway rolled her eyes at this set-piece slagging.
Indeed, Ms Sturgeon talks so much about her opponent's impending flit to the Lords, you wonder if she's secretly jealous.
Oh, for a quiet life warming the red leather at the public’s expense, amassing sinecures and comparing gout with George Foulkes.
'I say, Georgie, did I ever tell you about the time I gave evidence for eight solid hours? Marvel to behold. Should have got an Oscar.'
This week's Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, tried to rise above the partisan bickering.
"The exchanges that we have just heard represent the worst of our politics," he said, looking pained.
Coming from the bloke who had just replaced Richard Leonard, it was quite a criticism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel