THERE was a lot of restless grumbling at FMQs, as if everyone in the chamber had just realised the wrong turn they’d taken in life.
“I don’t expect reverential silence,” said Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh stirring from his semi-permanent coma, “but there should be no chuntering.”
Otherwise, it was familiar stuff - Ruth Davidson went on crime, Kezia Dugdale on health, Willie Rennie on police, and Nicola Sturgeon went on the rampage.
The bright spots were two backbenchers, starting with Nat John Mason, who fretted over men being shy about check-ups for cancer.
“I have to confess I am one of them,” he added. Ms Sturgeon’s rictus
as she tried to erase the mental image of Mr Mason bracing for a prostate exam was absolutely priceless.
Then Tory newbie Maurice Golden took the kamikaze route to Holyrood glory by asking the FM why she spent £136,000 on her failed legal intervention on Article 50.
Ms Sturgeon said it was “absolutely essential” to get stuck in and confirm the Sewel Convention was mince, and it definitely wasn’t a stunt, no sir, not at all.
And by the way, how much did Theresa May spend on her doomed Article 50 appeal?
Young Maurice then lurched into a clanking gag about a TV quiz.
“This is like a game of ‘Jeopardy!’ The answer is, ‘Brexit, Westminster and the Tories’. What is the question? Any question you ask this First Minister,” he said, to universal cries of “Whit?”
As Slow Mo dawdled further and further from making a point, Ms Davidson started an eye-rolling blether with her deputy Jackson Carlaw. Big mistake.
“We always know when Ruth Davidson is completely embarrassed by one of her back benchers, because she starts having a completely separate conversation,” said Ms Sturgeon.
“I sympathise with her, because I would have been embarrassed by that question as well, if it had been asked by one of my back benchers.”
Mr Davidson asked if the FM would answer him. “Don’t you worry,” she replied, before dismantling Mr G atom by atom. At the end, the SNP benches gave his remains a warm round of applause. For an epitaph, I think ‘Golden by name, leaden by nature’ is still available.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here