By Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Greg Hands
For modern Britain, today, March 24, is an important day.
The day, in 1603, when James VI of Scotland also became James I of England.
Some regard this as the beginning of modern British history, paving the way, over a hundred years later, for the Act of Union.
And in 2016, March 24 could have been just as significant.
It would have been the day Scotland officially broke away from the rest of the UK following a vote for independence in 2014.
Fortunately, this didn’t materialise. Scottish voters decided to keep our centuries old union.
And they did this for good reasons.
No one can deny that the United Kingdom has been a success.
And nor would anyone say it has all been plain sailing.
But the benefits for us all both north and south of the border are clear.
At a time when the world is facing its most uncertain period since the Great Recession, the UK government’s long-term economic plan is working right across the UK. The deficit has fallen by almost two-thirds and, here in Scotland, employment is close to a record high.
And only last week the Chancellor, George Osborne, set out how the broad shoulders of the UK are helping to support one of Britain - and Scotland’s - most important sectors.
His Budget set out £1 billion in additional support for the oil and gas sector, helping to protect an estimated 375,000 jobs.
This builds on the £1.3 billion of support already provided by the UK government to unlock the North Sea for the next generation and make sure it is fit for the future.
But let me be clear, none of this support would have been remotely affordable if Scotland was breaking away from the rest of the UK today, as the nationalists wanted.
The Scottish government’s own numbers show an independent Scotland would have faced a £20 billion black hole in its public finances over its first three years. It would have been starting with a fiscal crisis under the burden of the highest budget deficit in the western world.
Thankfully, the Scottish people decided that we are better together in one United Kingdom.
However, believing in our United Kingdom is not the same as believing that every decision should be taken here in London.
That is why we are overseeing the most radical transfer of powers to Scotland in centuries.
Since September 2014, the government has been working to deliver our promise to make the Scottish Parliament one of the most powerful and accountable devolved parliaments in the world.
Key to these new powers is the new Fiscal Framework for the Scottish Government, agreed last month.
The Fiscal Framework will underpin the Scottish Government’s new tax raising powers, so for the first time in over 300 years politicians in Edinburgh will be responsible for setting income tax rates and thresholds for workers in Scotland, from April next year.
What the rates will be is a matter for them. But Ruth Davidson MSP was right when she said families in Scotland should not pay a premium for living north of the Border. Her “not a penny more” pledge makes sound economic sense.
And I am confident that the powers, used effectively, can further increase the economic prosperity of Scotland, as part of the UK.
In the meantime, the changes we announced at Budget to the income tax personal allowance will benefit 2.6 million tax payers in Scotland.
All of this means the upcoming Scottish elections will be fought on the issues which matter most: how the next Scottish government uses these extensive new powers.
But whatever happens in May, Scotland will continue to benefit from the economic and national security that comes from being part of the UK.
So this week will not be a leap into uncertainty with separation, but instead this is the week when the Scotland Bill passes and a new world of opportunity opens up to Scotland, as part of a strong and enduring United Kingdom.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel